Bruder Markus, Won Sae-Yeon, Wagner Marlies, Brawanski Nina, Dinc Nazife, Kashefiolasl Sepide, Seifert Volker, Konczalla Juergen
Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e122-e128. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.188. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Demographic changes are leading to an aging society with a growing number of patients with cardiovascular diseases, relying on antiplatelet drugs like acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Although antiplatelet agents are suspected to be protective not only in the cardiologic but in the neurovascular field, the alteration of the coagulating process could have a major impact on the course and outcome after rupture of intracranial aneurysms.
Between June 1999 and December 2014, 1422 patients were treated for aneurysmal SAH in our institution, 144 (10.1%) with continuous ASA at the time of aneurysm rupture. A matched-pair analysis was performed.
The rate of patients with continuous ASA treatment while rupture of the aneurysm is rising significantly (P < 0.01). Those patients were significantly older than patients without ASA (60 vs. 53 years, P < 0.001). ASA-treated patients more often had aneurysmal rebleeding (4.7% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.3) and treatment-related hemorrhagic complications (13.9% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.06). However, rates were not different in microsurgical or endovascular procedures (16.4% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.6). Favorable outcome (Modified Rankin Scale 0-2) was achieved in 49.3% of the ASA group and 52.1% of the control group (P = 0.7).
Patients with continuous ASA treatment were significantly older than patients without ASA, but there was no difference in admission status or bleeding pattern. Outcome was not different in the matched-pair analysis. There was no statistical difference in treatment related-complication rates of microsurgical and endovascular procedures. Therefore, ASA use should not influence treatment decision of the ruptured aneurysm.
人口结构变化正导致社会老龄化,心血管疾病患者数量不断增加,这些患者依赖于阿司匹林(ASA)等抗血小板药物。尽管抗血小板药物不仅被认为在心脏病学领域有保护作用,在神经血管领域也有保护作用,但凝血过程的改变可能对颅内动脉瘤破裂后的病程和预后产生重大影响。
1999年6月至2014年12月期间,我院对1422例动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者进行了治疗,其中144例(10.1%)在动脉瘤破裂时持续服用ASA。进行了配对分析。
动脉瘤破裂时持续接受ASA治疗的患者比例显著上升(P<0.01)。这些患者比未服用ASA的患者年龄明显更大(60岁对53岁,P<0.001)。接受ASA治疗的患者动脉瘤再出血的情况更常见(4.7%对2.3%,P=0.3),且治疗相关出血并发症更多(13.9%对6.2%,P=0.06)。然而,在显微手术或血管内介入手术中,发生率并无差异(16.4%对12.2%,P=0.6)。ASA组49.3%的患者和对照组52.1%的患者获得了良好预后(改良Rankin量表评分为0 - 2)(P=0.7)。
持续接受ASA治疗的患者比未服用ASA的患者年龄明显更大,但入院状态或出血模式并无差异。配对分析中预后无差异。显微手术和血管内介入手术的治疗相关并发症发生率无统计学差异。因此,使用ASA不应影响破裂动脉瘤的治疗决策。