Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 May;165(5):1241-1250. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05556-z. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
The number of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who are on antithrombotic agents before ictus is rising. However, their effect on early brain injury and disease development remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine if antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) were associated with a worse initial hemorrhage severity, rebleeding rate, clinical course, and functional recovery after aSAH.
In this observational study, those 888 patients with aSAH, treated at the neurosurgical department, Uppsala University Hospital, between 2008 and 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, radiological (Fisher and Hijdra score), and outcome (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale one year post-ictus) variables were assessed.
Out of 888 aSAH patients, 14% were treated with antithrombotic agents before ictus. Seventy-five percent of these were on single therapy of antiplatelets, 23% on single therapy of anticoagulants, and 3% on a combination of antithrombotic agents. Those with antithrombotic agents pre-ictus were significantly older and exhibited more co-morbidities and a worse coagulation status according to lab tests. Antithrombotic agents, both as one group and as subtypes (antiplatelets and anticoagulants), were not associated with hemorrhage severity (Hijdra score/Fisher) nor rebleeding rate. The clinical course did not differ in terms of delayed ischemic neurological deficits or last-tier treatment with thiopental and decompressive craniectomy. These patients experienced a higher mortality and lower rate of favorable outcome in univariate analyses, but this did not hold true in multiple logistic regression analyses after adjustment for age and co-morbidities.
After adjustment for age and co-morbidities, antithrombotic agents before aSAH ictus were not associated with worse hemorrhage severity, rebleeding rate, clinical course, or long-term functional recovery.
在发生脑动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)之前正在使用抗血栓药物的患者数量正在增加。然而,它们对早期脑损伤和疾病发展的影响尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是确定抗血栓药物(抗血小板药物和抗凝剂)是否与 aSAH 患者更严重的初始出血程度、再出血率、临床病程和功能恢复有关。
在这项观察性研究中,纳入了 2008 年至 2018 年期间在乌普萨拉大学医院神经外科接受治疗的 888 例 aSAH 患者。评估了人口统计学、临床、影像学(Fisher 和 Hijdra 评分)和预后(发病后一年的扩展格拉斯哥预后量表)变量。
在 888 例 aSAH 患者中,有 14%的患者在发病前接受了抗血栓药物治疗。其中 75%的患者接受单一抗血小板药物治疗,23%的患者接受单一抗凝药物治疗,3%的患者接受联合抗血栓药物治疗。与未接受抗血栓药物治疗的患者相比,发病前接受抗血栓药物治疗的患者年龄更大,合并症更多,实验室检查提示凝血状态更差。抗血栓药物(整体以及抗血小板药物和抗凝剂亚组)与出血严重程度(Hijdra 评分/Fisher)或再出血率均无相关性。在出现迟发性缺血性神经功能缺损或最后采用硫喷妥钠和去骨瓣减压术方面,两组患者的临床病程没有差异。在单变量分析中,这些患者的死亡率更高,预后良好的比例更低,但在调整年龄和合并症后进行多变量逻辑回归分析时,这一结果不再成立。
在调整年龄和合并症后,aSAH 发病前使用抗血栓药物与更严重的出血程度、再出血率、临床病程或长期功能恢复无关。