Department of Anesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Pain Med. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):2223-2235. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny004.
To use quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess whether a stellate ganglion block (SGB) modulates the analgesia induced by cervical paravertebral block (CPVB).
A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Department of Anesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital, October 2011 to December 2015.
Twenty-eight adults scheduled for arthroscopy of a nonfractured shoulder were enrolled.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either single CPVB (5 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5%) or combined CPVB + SGB (5 mL and 3 mL of levobubivacaine 0.5%, respectively). The detection thresholds for cold/warm sensations and cold/heat pain were established using thermal QST on the C4-C7 dermatomes before local anesthetic infiltration and at 0.5, 6, 10, and 24 hours thereafter. Our primary outcome was the time course of QST thresholds for the different neurosensitive/nociceptive modalities. As secondary and tertiary outcomes, we evaluated the degree of motor block and the time to first administration of rescue analgesics.
We randomized 20 patients. There were no significant differences in the detection thresholds for the neurosensitive/nociceptive modalities, motor block, or timing for rescue analgesics between the groups (P = 0.15-0.94). All patients with CPVB + SGB exhibited Horner's signs, whereas patients in the CPVB group did not exhibit these signs; however, this does not exclude sympathetic block.
We were unable to demonstrate any analgesic benefit of CPVB + SGB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. It is therefore not unreasonable to suppose that pain from soft tissue injuries without bony lesions is transmitted mainly by somatic nerves with no or only minimal involvement of the sympathetic nervous system.
使用定量感觉测试(QST)来评估星状神经节阻滞(SGB)是否会调节颈椎旁神经阻滞(CPVB)引起的镇痛作用。
前瞻性双盲随机对照试验。
安特卫普大学医院麻醉科,2011 年 10 月至 2015 年 12 月。
28 名计划行非骨折性肩关节关节镜手术的成年人。
参与者被随机分配接受单次 CPVB(5mL 左旋布比卡因 0.5%)或联合 CPVB+SGB(分别为 5mL 和 3mL 左旋布比卡因 0.5%)。在局部麻醉浸润前和之后的 0.5、6、10 和 24 小时,使用 C4-C7 皮区的热 QST 确定冷/温觉和冷/热痛觉的检测阈值。我们的主要结局是不同神经敏感/伤害性模式的 QST 阈值的时间过程。作为次要和次要结局,我们评估了运动阻滞的程度和首次使用解救性镇痛药物的时间。
我们随机分配了 20 名患者。在神经敏感/伤害性模式、运动阻滞或解救性镇痛药物的时间方面,两组之间的检测阈值没有显著差异(P=0.15-0.94)。所有接受 CPVB+SGB 的患者均出现霍纳氏征,而接受 CPVB 组的患者则没有出现这些征;然而,这并不能排除交感神经阻滞。
我们未能证明 CPVB+SGB 在肩关节镜手术中具有任何镇痛益处。因此,没有或只有最小的交感神经参与的躯体神经主要传递没有骨损伤的软组织损伤的疼痛是合理的假设。