Sasse Andre D, Sasse Emma C, Clark Luciana Go, Clark Otavio Augusto Camara
Internal Medicine, UNICAMP (Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Av Dr. Luiz de Tella 1515, Cidade Universitaria, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 13083 000.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD005413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005413.pub3.
Malignant melanoma, one of the most aggressive of all skin cancers, is increasing in incidence throughout the world. Surgery remains the cornerstone of curative treatment in earlier stages. Metastatic disease is incurable in most affected people, because melanoma does not respond to most systemic treatments. A number of novel approaches are under evaluation and have shown promising results, but they are usually associated with increased toxicity and cost. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has been reported to improve treatment results, but it is still unclear whether evidence exists to support this choice, compared with chemotherapy alone. No language restrictions were imposed.
To compare the effects of therapy with chemotherapy and immunotherapy (chemoimmunotherapy) versus chemotherapy alone in people with metastatic malignant melanoma.
We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (14 February 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (2003 to 30 January 2006 ), EMBASE (2003 to 20 July 2005) and LILACS (1982 to 20 February 2006). References, conference proceedings, and databases of ongoing trials were also used to locate trials.
All randomised controlled trials that compared the use of chemotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy on people of any age, diagnosed with metastatic melanoma.
Two authors independently assessed each study to determine whether it met the pre-defined selection criteria, with differences being resolved through discussion with the review team. Two authors independently extracted the data from the articles using data extraction forms. Quality assessment included an evaluation of various components associated with biased estimates of treatment effect. Whenever possible, a meta-analysis was performed on the extracted data, in order to calculate a weighed treatment effect across trials.
Eighteen studies met our criteria and were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 2625 participants. We found evidence of an increase of objective response rates in people treated with chemoimmunotherapy, in comparison with people treated with chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact of these increased response rates was not translated into a survival benefit. We found no difference in survival to support the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy in the systemic treatment of metastatic melanoma, with a hazard ratio of 0.89 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.11, P = 0.31). Additionally, we found increased hematological and non-hematological toxicities in people treated with chemoimmunotherapy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We failed to find any clear evidence that the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy increases survival of people with metastatic melanoma. Further use of combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy should only be done in the context of clinical trials.
恶性黑色素瘤是所有皮肤癌中侵袭性最强的一种,在全球范围内发病率呈上升趋势。手术仍是早期根治性治疗的基石。转移性疾病在大多数患者中无法治愈,因为黑色素瘤对大多数全身治疗均无反应。一些新方法正在评估中,且已显示出有前景的结果,但它们通常伴随着毒性增加和成本上升。据报道,化疗与免疫疗法联合使用可改善治疗效果,但与单纯化疗相比,是否有证据支持这一选择仍不清楚。检索无语言限制。
比较化疗与免疫疗法(化疗免疫疗法)联合治疗与单纯化疗对转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane皮肤组专业注册库(2006年2月14日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2005年第3期)、MEDLINE(2003年至2006年1月30日)、EMBASE(2003年至2005年7月20日)和LILACS(1982年至2006年2月20日)。还利用参考文献、会议论文集和正在进行试验的数据库来查找试验。
所有比较化疗与化疗免疫疗法对任何年龄、诊断为转移性黑色素瘤患者疗效的随机对照试验。
两位作者独立评估每项研究,以确定其是否符合预先设定的入选标准,如有分歧则通过与综述团队讨论解决。两位作者使用数据提取表从文章中独立提取数据。质量评估包括对与治疗效果偏倚估计相关的各个组成部分的评估。只要有可能,就对提取的数据进行荟萃分析,以便计算各试验的加权治疗效果。
18项研究符合我们的标准并纳入荟萃分析,共有2625名参与者。我们发现,与接受化疗的患者相比,接受化疗免疫疗法的患者客观缓解率有所提高。然而,这些提高的缓解率并未转化为生存获益。我们发现,在转移性黑色素瘤的全身治疗中,添加免疫疗法至化疗对生存无差异,风险比为0.89(95%CI 0.72至1.11,P = 0.31)。此外,我们发现接受化疗免疫疗法的患者血液学和非血液学毒性增加。
我们未能找到任何明确证据表明,在化疗基础上加用免疫疗法可提高转移性黑色素瘤患者的生存率。免疫疗法与化疗联合的进一步应用应仅在临床试验背景下进行。