Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium.
Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3600 Leuven, Belgium.
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:179-184. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.042. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
We aimed to validate retrospectively the accuracy of simplified electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring derived from the bispectral index (BIS) monitor in post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients.
Successfully resuscitated CA patients were transferred to the Catherization Lab followed by percutaneous coronary intervention when indicated. On arrival at the coronary care unit, bilateral BIS monitoring was started and continued up to 72 h. Raw simplified EEG tracings were extracted from the BIS monitor at a time point coinciding with the registration of standard EEG monitoring. BIS EEG tracings were reviewed by two neurophysiologists, who were asked to indicate the presence of following patterns: diffuse slowing rhythm, burst suppression pattern, cerebral inactivity, periodic epileptiform discharges and status epilepticus (SE). Additionally, these simplified BIS EEG tracings were analysed by two inexperienced investigators, who were asked to indicate the presence of SE only.
Thirty-two simplified BIS EEG samples were analysed. Compared to standard EEG, neurophysiologists interpreted all simplified EEG samples with a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 100% and an interobserver variability of 0.843. Furthermore, SE was identified with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 94% by two unexperienced physicians.
Using a simple classification system, raw simplified EEG derived from a BIS monitoring device is comparable to standard EEG monitoring. Moreover, investigators without EEG experience were capable to identify SE in post-CA patients. Future studies will be warranted to confirm our results and to determine the added value of using simplified BIS EEG in terms of prognostic and therapeutic implications.
我们旨在回顾性验证简化脑电图(EEG)监测从双频谱指数(BIS)监测器在心脏骤停(CA)后患者中的准确性。
成功复苏的 CA 患者被转移到导管室,然后根据需要进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。到达冠心病监护病房后,开始双侧 BIS 监测,并持续至 72 小时。在与标准 EEG 监测记录同时的时间点,从 BIS 监测器中提取原始简化 EEG 轨迹。两名神经生理学家审查 BIS EEG 轨迹,并要求他们指出以下模式的存在:弥漫性减速节律、爆发抑制模式、脑无活动、周期性癫痫样放电和癫痫持续状态(SE)。此外,两名没有经验的研究人员分析了这些简化的 BIS EEG 轨迹,要求他们仅指出 SE 的存在。
分析了 32 个简化的 BIS EEG 样本。与标准 EEG 相比,神经生理学家以 86%的敏感性、100%的特异性和 0.843 的观察者间变异性解释了所有简化 EEG 样本。此外,两名经验不足的医生通过 SE 识别的敏感性为 80%,特异性为 94%。
使用简单的分类系统,从 BIS 监测设备获得的原始简化 EEG 与标准 EEG 监测相当。此外,没有 EEG 经验的研究人员能够识别 CA 后患者的 SE。未来的研究将证实我们的结果,并确定在预后和治疗意义方面使用简化 BIS EEG 的附加价值。