• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

升阶梯策略时代的微创外科治疗重症急性胰腺炎。

Minimally invasive surgery in the era of step-up approach for treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.

机构信息

Unit of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.017
PMID:29409791
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the minimally invasive surgery into the step-up approach procedures as a standard treatment for severe acute pancreatitis and comparing its results with those obtained by classical management.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study comparative with two groups treated over two consecutive, equal periods of time were defined: group A, classic management with open necrosectomy from January 2006 to June 2010; and group B, management with the step-up approach with minimally invasive surgery from July 2010 to December 2014.

RESULTS

In group A, 83 patients with severe acute pancreatitis were treated, of whom 19 underwent at least one laparotomy, and in 5 any minimally invasive surgery. In group B, 81 patients were treated: minimally invasive surgery was necessary in 17 cases and laparotomy in 3. Among operated patients, the time from admission to first interventional procedures was significantly longer in group B (9 days vs. 18.5 days; p = 0.042). There were no significant differences in Intensive Care Unit stay or overall stay: 9.5 and 27 days (group A) vs. 8.5 and 21 days (group B). Mortality in operated patients and mortality overall were 50% and 18.1% in group A vs 0% and 6.2% in group B (p < 0.001 and p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the step-up approach and minimally invasive surgery algorithm is feasible and could be considered as the standard of treatment for severe acute pancreatitis. The mortality rate deliberately descends when it is used.

摘要

目的

评估微创外科逐步升级方法作为治疗重症急性胰腺炎的标准治疗方法,并将其结果与经典治疗方法进行比较。

方法

回顾性队列研究比较了两个连续相等时间段内治疗的两组患者:A 组,2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 6 月采用开放式坏死组织切除术的经典治疗;B 组,2010 年 7 月至 2014 年 12 月采用微创外科逐步升级方法治疗。

结果

A 组中,83 例重症急性胰腺炎患者接受了治疗,其中 19 例行至少一次剖腹手术,5 例行任何微创外科手术。B 组中,81 例患者接受了治疗:微创外科手术在 17 例中是必要的,剖腹手术在 3 例中是必要的。在接受手术的患者中,B 组从入院到首次介入治疗的时间明显更长(9 天与 18.5 天;p=0.042)。重症监护病房停留时间或总停留时间无显著差异:A 组为 9.5 和 27 天,B 组为 8.5 和 21 天。在接受手术的患者中,A 组的死亡率和总死亡率分别为 50%和 18.1%,B 组分别为 0%和 6.2%(p<0.001 和 p=0.030)。

结论

逐步升级方法与微创外科算法相结合是可行的,可以考虑作为重症急性胰腺炎的治疗标准。当使用这种方法时,死亡率明显下降。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery in the era of step-up approach for treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.升阶梯策略时代的微创外科治疗重症急性胰腺炎。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
[Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: traditional laparotomy vs. minimally invasive procedures].[急性坏死性胰腺炎:传统开腹手术与微创手术对比]
Rozhl Chir. 2015 Apr;94(4):160-5.
3
Minimally invasive drainage in critically ill patients with severe necrotizing pancreatitis is associated with better outcomes: an observational study.严重坏死性胰腺炎危重症患者微创引流与更好的结局相关:一项观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Nov 22;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2256-x.
4
Minimally invasive operations for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: comparison of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy with endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy.微创治疗急性坏死性胰腺炎:微创经腹膜后坏死组织清除术与内镜经胃坏死组织清除术的比较。
Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3 Suppl 1):S128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
5
Is Contemporary Open Pancreatic Necrosectomy Still Useful In The Minimally Invasive Era?当代微创时代的开放性胰腺坏死清除术是否仍然有用?
Surgery. 2024 May;175(5):1394-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.021. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
6
The effect of a novel minimally invasive strategy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.新型微创策略治疗感染性坏死性胰腺炎的效果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4603-4616. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5522-0. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
7
[Minimally invasive surgical interventions in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis].[微创外科干预治疗重症急性胰腺炎]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2020(4):30-36. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202004130.
8
Minimally invasive and endoscopic versus open necrosectomy for necrotising pancreatitis: a pooled analysis of individual data for 1980 patients.微创和内镜下与开放性坏死组织清除术治疗坏死性胰腺炎:对 1980 名患者的个体数据进行的汇总分析。
Gut. 2018 Apr;67(4):697-706. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313341. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
Minimally invasive 'step-up approach' versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868].急性坏死性胰腺炎患者的微创“逐步升级法”与最大程度坏死组织清除术对比研究(PANTER试验):一项随机对照多中心试验的设计与原理[国际标准随机对照试验编号13975868]
BMC Surg. 2006 Apr 11;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-6-6.
10
Three-port retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy in management of acute necrotic pancreatitis.三孔经腹膜后途径内镜下坏死组织清除术治疗急性坏死性胰腺炎。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2010;46(3):176-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Step-Up versus Open Approach in the Treatment of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Case-Matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Long-Term Pancreatic Sufficiency.急性坏死性胰腺炎治疗中逐步升级法与开放手术法的比较:临床结局与长期胰腺功能的病例匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 27;13(13):3766. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133766.
2
Prevention and Treatment of Grade C Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.C级术后胰瘘的防治
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 19;11(24):7516. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247516.
3
Clinical Value of Neutrophil CD64 Index, PCT, and CRP in Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Abdominal Infection.
中性粒细胞CD64指数、降钙素原(PCT)及C反应蛋白(CRP)在急性胰腺炎合并腹腔感染中的临床价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 5;12(10):2409. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102409.
4
Consensus and controversy among severe pancreatitis surgery guidelines: a guideline evaluation based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool.重症胰腺炎手术指南中的共识与争议:基于《研究与评价指南评估II》(AGREE II)工具的指南评估
Gland Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):1551-1563. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-444.
5
A patient with severe acute pancreatitis who was successfully rescued by multiple disciplinary teams: a case report.多学科团队成功救治的一例重症急性胰腺炎患者:病例报告
J Int Med Res. 2019 Nov;47(11):5831-5838. doi: 10.1177/0300060519874156. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
6
Outcomes from different minimally invasive approaches for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.感染性坏死性胰腺炎不同微创治疗方法的疗效
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(24):e16111. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016111.
7
Quantification of the impact of interventional radiology in the management of acute pancreatitis.介入放射学在急性胰腺炎管理中的影响量化
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1195-1200. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-01970-4. Epub 2019 Feb 13.