Fridy Risa L, Maslyanskaya Sofya, Lim Sylvia, Coupey Susan M
Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York; Private Medical Practice, New York, New York.
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018 Aug;31(4):394-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
A 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement identified long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) as first-line choices for adolescents, but pediatricians' current knowledge and practices about intrauterine devices (IUDs) and subdermal contraceptive implants (Implants) is unknown. We aimed to characterize pediatricians' knowledge and practices about LARCs for adolescents.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional online survey emailed to a convenience sample of AAP member pediatricians in New York, Utah, Illinois, and Kansas in 2015 and 2016. The study included 561 practicing pediatricians.
We measured knowledge about the suitability of IUDs and Implants for adolescents using two 7-item scales; a score of 7 indicates all correct. We dichotomized participants' scores as high and low knowledge if they scored ≥85% correct or <85%, respectively.
Mean age was 47.4 (±11) years; 73% were female; and 72% general pediatricians. Almost all, 88%, counsel about contraception; 64% counsel about IUDs, and Implants, but only 4.1% insert them; 72% prescribe short-acting hormonal contraceptives; 44% had read the AAP policy statement. Mean score on the knowledge scale was lower for IUDs than for Implants (4.2 vs 5.1, respectively; P < .001). Multivariable regression analysis indicated that female pediatricians, adolescent medicine subspecialists, agreeing that pregnancy is a serious problem for adolescents in their practice, and having read the AAP policy statement predicted high knowledge about IUDs as well as Implants for adolescents.
Most pediatrician respondents provided reproductive health care for adolescents and counseled about LARCs, but few inserted the devices. We identified knowledge deficits about suitability of IUDs for adolescents.
2014年美国儿科学会(AAP)的一项政策声明将长效可逆避孕法(LARC)列为青少年的一线选择,但儿科医生目前关于宫内节育器(IUD)和皮下避孕植入剂(植入物)的知识和实践情况尚不清楚。我们旨在描述儿科医生关于青少年使用LARC的知识和实践情况。
设计、地点和参与者:2015年和2016年,通过电子邮件向纽约、犹他州、伊利诺伊州和堪萨斯州的AAP成员儿科医生的便利样本发送横断面在线调查。该研究包括561名执业儿科医生。
我们使用两个包含7个条目的量表来衡量关于IUD和植入物对青少年适用性的知识;得分为7表示全部正确。如果参与者的得分分别≥85%正确或<85%,我们将他们的分数分为高知识水平和低知识水平。
平均年龄为47.4(±11)岁;73%为女性;72%为普通儿科医生。几乎所有(88%)的医生会提供避孕咨询;64%的医生会提供关于IUD和植入物的咨询,但只有4.1%的医生会进行植入;72%的医生会开短效激素避孕药;44%的医生读过AAP的政策声明。IUD知识量表的平均得分低于植入物(分别为4.2和5.1;P<0.001)。多变量回归分析表明,女性儿科医生、青少年医学亚专科医生、认同怀孕在其临床实践中对青少年是一个严重问题以及读过AAP政策声明的医生,对青少年IUD和植入物的知识水平较高。
大多数参与调查的儿科医生为青少年提供生殖健康护理并就LARC提供咨询,但很少有人进行植入操作。我们发现儿科医生在IUD对青少年适用性方面存在知识缺陷。