Vargas Nicole T, Chapman Christopher L, Sackett James R, Abdul-Rashed Jabril, McBryde Muhamed, Johnson Blair D, Gathercole Rob, Schlader Zachary J
Center for Research and Education in Special Environments, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
lululemon Athletica Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Physiol Behav. 2018 May 1;188:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior during the exercise recovery compensates for elevated core temperatures despite autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal. In a thermoneutral environment, 6 females and 6 males (22 ± 1 y) cycled for 60 min (225 ± 46 W metabolic heat production), followed by 60 min passive recovery. Mean skin and core temperatures, skin blood flow, and local sweat rate were measured continually. Subjects controlled the temperature of their dorsal neck to perceived thermal comfort using a custom-made neck device. Neck device temperature provided an index of thermal behavior. Mean body temperature, calculated as the average of mean skin and core temperatures, provided an index of the stimulus for thermal behavior. To isolate the independent effect of exercise on thermal behavior during recovery, data were analyzed post-exercise the exact minute mean body temperature recovered to pre-exercise levels within a subject. Mean body temperature returned to pre-exercise levels 28 ± 20 min into recovery (Pre: 33.5 ± 0.2, Post: 33.5 ± 0.2 °C, P = 0.20), at which point, mean skin temperature had recovered (Pre: 29.6 ± 0.4, Post: 29.5 ± 0.5 °C, P = 0.20) and core temperature (Pre: 37.3 ± 0.2, Post: 37.5 ± 0.3 °C, P = 0.01) remained elevated. Post-exercise, skin blood flow (Pre: 59 ± 78, Post: 26 ± 25 PU, P = 0.10) and local sweat rate (Pre: 0.05 ± 0.25, Post: 0.13 ± 0.14 mg/cm min, P = 0.09) returned to pre-exercise levels, while neck device temperature was depressed (Pre: 27.4 ± 1.1, Post: 21.6 ± 7.4 °C, P = 0.03). These findings suggest that thermal behavior compensates for autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal in the presence of elevated core temperatures post-exercise.
尽管自主热效应器活动减退,但运动恢复期间的热行为能够补偿升高的核心体温。在热中性环境中,6名女性和6名男性(22±1岁)进行60分钟的骑行(代谢产热225±46瓦),随后进行60分钟的被动恢复。持续测量平均皮肤温度、核心温度、皮肤血流量和局部出汗率。受试者使用定制的颈部装置将其颈部背部温度控制在感知到的热舒适状态。颈部装置温度提供了热行为的一个指标。平均体温通过平均皮肤温度和核心温度的平均值计算得出,提供了热行为刺激的一个指标。为了分离运动对恢复期间热行为的独立影响,在运动后对数据进行分析,即受试者的平均体温恢复到运动前水平的精确分钟数。平均体温在恢复28±20分钟时回到运动前水平(运动前:33.5±0.2,运动后:33.5±0.2°C,P = 0.20),此时,平均皮肤温度已恢复(运动前:29.6±0.4,运动后:29.5±0.5°C,P = 0.20),而核心温度(运动前:37.3±0.2,运动后:37.5±0.3°C,P = 0.01)仍处于升高状态。运动后,皮肤血流量(运动前:59±78,运动后:26±25 PU,P = 0.10)和局部出汗率(运动前:0.05±0.25,运动后:0.13±0.14毫克/平方厘米·分钟,P = 0.09)回到运动前水平,而颈部装置温度降低(运动前:27.4±1.1,运动后:21.6±7.4°C,P = 0.03)。这些发现表明,在运动后核心体温升高的情况下,热行为能够补偿自主热效应器活动的减退。