Department of Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Department of Radiology, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;37(3):501-509. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3197-7. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
In a preliminary investigation of FDG-PET/CT for assessment of therapy response of pyogenic spine infection, it was concluded that activity confined to the margins of a destroyed or degenerated joint with bone-on-bone contact represents nonseptic inflammation, regardless of the intensity of uptake. Only activity in bone, soft tissue, or within the epidural space represents active infection. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the performance of these pattern-based interpretation criteria in a series of problem cases of proven or suspected spine infection. Eighty-two FDG-PET/CTs were done for initial diagnosis because other imaging failed to provide a definitive diagnosis and 147 FDG-PET/CTs were done to assess treatment responses. Pattern-based interpretations were compared with the clinical diagnosis based on bacterial cultures and outcomes after cessation or withholding of antibiotic therapy. Pattern-based interpretation criteria achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 98 and 100%, respectively, for initial diagnosis and a specificity of 100% for assessment of treatment response. The same data was analyzed using intensity of activity as the primary factor. Sensitivity and specificity using the intensity-based criteria were 93 and 68%, respectively, for initial diagnosis, and the specificity of a negative interpretation for therapy response was 55%. Differences from pattern-based criteria are highly significant. Pattern-based criteria perform well in problem cases with equivocal MR and for treatment response because they correctly eliminate activity from nonspecific inflammation associated with destroyed joints with bone-on-bone contact. Response occurs within a timeframe that is useful for managing antibiotic therapy.
在一项初步研究中,使用 FDG-PET/CT 评估化脓性脊柱感染的治疗反应,得出的结论是,局限于破坏或退行性关节边缘的活动,且与骨对骨接触有关,代表非感染性炎症,而与摄取的强度无关。只有骨、软组织或硬膜外间隙内的活动代表活动性感染。本研究旨在评估这些基于模式的解释标准在一系列经证实或疑似脊柱感染的疑难病例中的表现。82 例 FDG-PET/CT 用于初始诊断,因为其他影像学检查未能提供明确的诊断,147 例 FDG-PET/CT 用于评估治疗反应。基于模式的解释与基于细菌培养的临床诊断和停止或不使用抗生素治疗后的结果进行了比较。基于模式的解释标准在初始诊断中的敏感性和特异性分别为 98%和 100%,在评估治疗反应的特异性方面为 100%。同样的数据使用活性强度作为主要因素进行了分析。基于强度的标准在初始诊断中的敏感性和特异性分别为 93%和 68%,治疗反应阴性解释的特异性为 55%。基于模式的标准与基于强度的标准之间存在显著差异。基于模式的标准在存在可疑 MRI 且需要评估治疗反应的疑难病例中表现良好,因为它们可以正确排除与骨对骨接触的破坏关节相关的非特异性炎症的活性。反应发生在一个对管理抗生素治疗有用的时间框架内。