Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Department of Ear Nose Throat Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Anaesthesia. 2018 Jun;73(6):730-737. doi: 10.1111/anae.14236. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
Semi-rigid flexible introducer-guided tracheal intubation is associated with pharyngolaryngeal morbidities. We compared the practice of railroading a newly described modified reinforced silicone tracheal tube with a built-in guide channel in its wall over a non-kinking guidewire with railroading the same tube over a disposable bougie, with respect to pharyngolaryngeal morbidities. One hundred and twenty-four ASA 1 and 2 adults were randomly assigned to undergo bougie-guided (n = 62) or wire-guided (n = 62) intubation under general anaesthesia. All patients were assessed for postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complaints. In addition, voice parameters (fundamental frequency, shimmer, jitter and harmonic noise ratio) with vowels 'a' and 'i' were analysed pre-operatively and 24 h postoperatively. The success of first-attempt intubation and the associated haemodynamic response were also recorded. A higher incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complaints was seen in the bougie group, 48.3%, 95%CI (35.9-60.9%) when compared with wire-guided group 28.3%, 95%CI (18.0-40.6%), p = 0.01. Postoperatively, all the voice parameters were significantly more affected when compared with their pre-operative value in the bougie-guided group (p < 0.05) but not in the wire-guided group. The success of first-attempt intubation was similar in both groups. Wire-guided orotracheal intubation was associated with a lower incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complaints and effect on voice when compared with bougie-guided intubation.
半刚性弹性引导器引导气管插管与咽喉并发症相关。我们比较了在新描述的改良强化硅胶气管导管内置导槽内引导内置导丝与在一次性引导器上引导相同导管的方法,以观察其在咽喉并发症方面的差异。124 名 ASA 1 级和 2 级成人随机分为引导器引导(n = 62)或导丝引导(n = 62)全身麻醉下插管组。所有患者均评估术后咽喉不适情况。此外,还分析了术前和术后 24 小时元音“a”和“i”的声音参数(基频、抖动、声扰比)。还记录了首次尝试插管的成功率及其相关的血液动力学反应。与导丝引导组 28.3%(95%CI:18.0-40.6%)相比,引导器组 48.3%(95%CI:35.9-60.9%)咽喉并发症发生率更高,p = 0.01。与导丝引导组相比,术后所有声音参数均显著低于术前值(p < 0.05),但在导丝引导组中无差异。两组首次尝试插管成功率相似。与引导器引导插管相比,导丝引导经口气管插管与咽喉并发症发生率较低和对声音的影响较小相关。