• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索马里兰州莱姆病监测的替代方法。

Exploring an alternative approach to Lyme disease surveillance in Maryland.

作者信息

Rutz H, Hogan B, Hook S, Hinckley A, Feldman K

机构信息

Emerging Infections Program, Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

出版信息

Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Mar;65(2):254-259. doi: 10.1111/zph.12446. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1111/zph.12446
PMID:29411541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10880063/
Abstract

In Maryland, Lyme disease (LD) is a reportable disease and all laboratories and healthcare providers are required to report to the local health department. Given the volume of LD reports and effort required for investigation, surveillance for LD is burdensome and subject to underreporting. We explored the utility of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (administrative) codes for use with LD surveillance. We aimed to collect the administrative codes for a 10% sample of 2009 LD reports (n = 474) from 292 facilities stratified by case classification (confirmed, probable, suspected and not a case). Sixty-three per cent (n = 184) of facilities responded to the survey, and 341 different administrative codes were obtained for 91% (n = 430) of sampled reports. The administrative code for Lyme disease (088.81) was the most commonly reported code (133/430 patients) among sampled reports; while it was used for 62 of 151 (41%) confirmed cases, it was also used for 48 of 192 (25%) not a case reports (sensitivity 41% and specificity 73%). A combination of nine codes was developed with sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 37% when compared to not a case reports. We conclude that the administrative code for LD alone has low ability to identify LD cases in Maryland. Grouping certain codes improved sensitivity, but our results indicate that administrative codes alone are not a viable surveillance alternative for a disease with complex manifestations such as LD.

摘要

在马里兰州,莱姆病(LD)是一种应报告疾病,所有实验室和医疗服务提供者都必须向当地卫生部门报告。鉴于莱姆病报告的数量以及调查所需的工作量,莱姆病监测工作繁重且存在报告不足的情况。我们探讨了国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(行政管理)编码在莱姆病监测中的实用性。我们旨在收集2009年莱姆病报告中10%样本(n = 474)的行政管理编码,这些样本来自292个按病例分类(确诊、疑似、可能和非病例)分层的机构。63%(n = 184)的机构回复了调查,在91%(n = 430)的抽样报告中获得了341个不同的行政管理编码。莱姆病的行政管理编码(088.81)是抽样报告中最常报告的编码(133/430例患者);它在151例确诊病例中的62例(41%)中被使用,同时也在192例非病例报告中的48例(25%)中被使用(敏感性为41%,特异性为73%)。与非病例报告相比,开发了一个由九个编码组成的组合,其敏感性为74%,特异性为37%。我们得出结论,仅靠莱姆病的行政管理编码在马里兰州识别莱姆病病例的能力较低。对某些编码进行分组提高了敏感性,但我们的结果表明,对于像莱姆病这样具有复杂表现的疾病,仅靠行政管理编码并不是一种可行的监测替代方法。

相似文献

1
Exploring an alternative approach to Lyme disease surveillance in Maryland.探索马里兰州莱姆病监测的替代方法。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Mar;65(2):254-259. doi: 10.1111/zph.12446. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
2
Impacts of misclassification on Lyme disease surveillance.错误分类对莱姆病监测的影响。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2019 Feb;66(1):174-178. doi: 10.1111/zph.12525. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
3
Assessing diagnostic coding practices among a sample of healthcare facilities in Lyme disease endemic areas: Maryland and New York - A Brief Report.评估莱姆病流行地区(马里兰州和纽约州)部分医疗机构的诊断编码实践:简要报告
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Mar;65(2):275-278. doi: 10.1111/zph.12414. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
4
Effect of electronic laboratory reporting on the burden of lyme disease surveillance--New Jersey, 2001-2006.电子实验室报告对莱姆病监测负担的影响——新泽西州,2001 - 2006年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Jan 18;57(2):42-5.
5
Characterizing Lyme Disease Surveillance in an Endemic State.描述地方病流行状态下的莱姆病监测情况。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Mar;65(2):247-253. doi: 10.1111/zph.12275. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
6
Lyme Disease Surveillance in New York State: an Assessment of Case Underreporting.纽约州莱姆病监测:病例漏报情况评估
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Mar;65(2):238-246. doi: 10.1111/zph.12307. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
7
The public health impact of Lyme disease in Maryland.莱姆病对马里兰州公共卫生的影响。
J Infect Dis. 1996 May;173(5):1260-2. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.5.1260.
8
Tick bite and Lyme disease-related emergency department encounters in New Hampshire, 2010-2014.2010 - 2014年新罕布什尔州蜱虫叮咬及与莱姆病相关的急诊科就诊情况
Zoonoses Public Health. 2017 Dec;64(8):655-661. doi: 10.1111/zph.12361. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
9
Lyme disease surveillance in Maryland, 1992.1992年马里兰州的莱姆病监测
Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Jan;6(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(95)00096-8.
10
Validation of Random Sampling as an Estimation Procedure for Lyme Disease Surveillance in Massachusetts and Minnesota.随机抽样作为马萨诸塞州和明尼苏达州莱姆病监测估计程序的验证
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Mar;65(2):266-274. doi: 10.1111/zph.12297. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Algorithms to Detect Acute and Disseminated Lyme Disease in U.S. Administrative Claims Data.美国行政索赔数据中检测急性和播散性莱姆病算法的验证
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 27;12(4):ofaf109. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf109. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Epidemiology of Lyme Disease as Identified Through Electronic Health Records in a Large Midwestern Health System, 2016-2019.2016 - 2019年通过大型中西部医疗系统的电子健康记录确定的莱姆病流行病学
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 7;12(2):ofae758. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae758. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Incidence of hospitalizations related to Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases using Discharge Abstract Database, Canada, 2009-2021.利用出院摘要数据库报告 2009-2021 年加拿大莱姆病和其他蜱传疾病相关住院率。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0312703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312703. eCollection 2024.
4
Mapping the distribution of Lyme disease at a mid-Atlantic site in the United States using electronic health data.利用电子健康数据在美国大西洋中部地区绘制莱姆病的分布情况。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0301530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301530. eCollection 2024.
5
Surveillance for Lyme Disease After Implementation of a Revised Case Definition - United States, 2022.2022 年美国实施修订后病例定义后的莱姆病监测。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024 Feb 15;73(6):118-123. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7306a1.
6
Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA.基于索赔的美国马萨诸塞州莱姆病算法验证。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;29(9):1772-1779. doi: 10.3201/eid2909.221931.
7
Systematic comparisons between Lyme disease and post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome in the U.S. with administrative claims data.利用行政索赔数据对美国莱姆病与莱姆病治疗后综合征进行系统比较。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Apr;90:104524. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104524. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
8
Descriptive Data on Trends Among Patients Hospitalized With Lyme Disease in Southwest Michigan, 2017-2021.2017 - 2021年密歇根州西南部莱姆病住院患者趋势的描述性数据
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 7;10(1):ofac658. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac658. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Healthcare claims-based Lyme disease case-finding algorithms in the United States: A systematic literature review.基于医疗保健索赔的美国莱姆病病例发现算法:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276299. eCollection 2022.
10
Economic Burden of Reported Lyme Disease in High-Incidence Areas, United States, 2014-2016.2014-2016 年美国高发地区报告莱姆病的经济负担。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;28(6):1170-1179. doi: 10.3201/eid2806.211335.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing Lyme Disease Surveillance in an Endemic State.描述地方病流行状态下的莱姆病监测情况。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Mar;65(2):247-253. doi: 10.1111/zph.12275. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
2
Assessment of administrative claims data for public health reporting of Salmonella in Tennessee.田纳西州沙门氏菌公共卫生报告行政索赔数据评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e34-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002909. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
ICD90CM claims data are insufficient for influenza surveillance.国际疾病分类第九版临床修正版(ICD-9-CM)的理赔数据不足以用于流感监测。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:964.
4
ICD9 codes cannot reliably identify hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke.国际疾病分类第九版(ICD9)编码无法可靠地识别缺血性卒中的出血性转化。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):505-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000215. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
5
Use of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, coding in identifying chronic hepatitis B virus infection in health system data: implications for national surveillance.利用国际疾病分类第 9 版编码在卫生系统数据中识别慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染:对国家监测的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 May 1;20(3):441-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001558. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
6
Epidemiology of cryptococcal meningitis in the US: 1997-2009.美国隐球菌性脑膜炎的流行病学:1997-2009 年。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056269. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
7
Using administrative medical claims data to supplement state disease registry systems for reporting zoonotic infections.利用行政医疗索赔数据来补充州疾病登记系统,以报告人畜共患感染。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):193-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000948. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
8
Accuracy of pharmacy and coded-diagnosis information in identifying tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.识别类风湿关节炎患者结核病的药学和编码诊断信息的准确性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jun;21(6):666-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3243. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Utility of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for communicable disease surveillance.国际疾病分类,第九版临床修订本代码在传染病监测中的应用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1299-305. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq285. Epub 2010 Sep 28.