1 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63110.
2 Department of Surgery, Section of Burn/Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):761-765. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18496. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
Many centers advocate use of triple-contrast (IV, oral, and rectal) CT for assessing hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominopelvic trauma. Enteric contrast material has several disadvantages, leading our practice to pursue use of single-contrast (IV) CT. We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records at our institution to assess the accuracy of single-contrast CT for diagnosing bowel injuries in cases of penetrating abdominopelvic trauma.
We retrospectively reviewed patients who presented to our emergency department between January 1, 2004, and March 1, 2014, with penetrating abdominopelvic trauma, underwent an abdominopelvic CT, and had surgery performed thereafter. We reviewed pertinent emergency department records for details regarding the site of injury, the number of injuries per patient, and the type of weapon used. We correlated CT reports with operative notes for presence and sites of bowel injury.
A total of 274 patients (median age, 27 years old) met our inclusion criteria; 77% had sustained gunshot wounds (GSWs). CT showed bowel injury in 173 cases; surgery revealed bowel injury in 162 cases. CT had 142 true-positive, 31 false-positive, 81 true-negative, and 20 false-negative cases, resulting in sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 72%, positive predictive value of 82%, and negative predictive value of 80% for detecting bowel injuries. CT had the highest sensitivity and specificity in patients with multiple GSWs (94% and 79%, respectively) and those with injuries to the stomach and rectum.
Single-contrast CT can show bowel injuries in patients with penetrating abdominopelvic trauma with accuracy comparable with that reported for triple-contrast CT.
许多中心提倡使用三对比剂(静脉、口服和直肠) CT 来评估稳定型穿透性腹部骨盆创伤患者。肠内对比剂有几个缺点,导致我们的实践追求使用单对比剂(静脉) CT。我们对我院电子病历进行了回顾性分析,以评估单对比剂 CT 在诊断穿透性腹部骨盆创伤中肠损伤的准确性。
我们回顾性分析了 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 3 月 1 日期间在我院就诊的穿透性腹部骨盆创伤患者,他们接受了腹部骨盆 CT 检查,随后进行了手术。我们查阅了相关急诊记录,以了解损伤部位、每位患者的损伤数量以及使用的武器类型。我们将 CT 报告与手术记录进行了对比,以了解肠损伤的存在和部位。
共有 274 名患者(中位年龄 27 岁)符合我们的纳入标准;77%的患者有枪伤(GSWs)。CT 显示 173 例肠损伤;手术发现 162 例肠损伤。CT 有 142 个真阳性、31 个假阳性、81 个真阴性和 20 个假阴性病例,因此检测肠损伤的敏感性为 88%、特异性为 72%、阳性预测值为 82%、阴性预测值为 80%。在多发 GSWs 患者(分别为 94%和 79%)和胃和直肠损伤患者中,CT 的敏感性和特异性最高。
单对比剂 CT 可准确显示穿透性腹部骨盆创伤患者的肠损伤,与三对比剂 CT 报道的结果相当。