Blixen Carol, Kanuch Stephanie W, Perzynski Adam T, Thomas Charles, Dawson Neal V, Sajatovic Martha
Case Western Reserve University and Senior Scholar, Center for Health Care Research and Policy, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Center for Health Care Research and Policy, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Feb;32(1):127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
To develop a deeper understanding of "how" a nurse led self-management intervention in a successful randomized controlled trial (RCT) for individuals with both serious mental illness (SMI) and diabetes (DM) influenced health outcomes and the lives of the participants.
In depth interviews, were conducted with a sample of 10 participants who received the self-management intervention in the RCT. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using content analysis, with an emphasis on dominant themes.
The mean age of the respondents was 53.9years (SD=5.6); 6 (60%) were women and the mean level of education was 12.4years (SD=2.4). Transcript based analysis generated 3 major mechanisms of action that led to improved self-management of their SMI and DM: (Colton & Manderscheid, 2006) positive group experience, (Osborn et al., 2008) increased health knowledge, and (Newcomer, 2005) increased self- confidence.
Developing complex interventions for testing in RCTs of individuals with SMI and other comorbid conditions is of increasing importance in healthcare planning for this vulnerable population. Using qualitative methods to explore mechanisms of action underlying quantitative outcomes, can enrich our understanding of processes relevant for individuals with SMI and comorbid conditions.
更深入地了解在一项针对患有严重精神疾病(SMI)和糖尿病(DM)的个体的成功随机对照试验(RCT)中,护士主导的自我管理干预是“如何”影响健康结果和参与者生活的。
对随机对照试验中接受自我管理干预的10名参与者进行了深入访谈。访谈进行了录音,逐字转录,并采用内容分析法进行分析,重点关注主要主题。
受访者的平均年龄为53.9岁(标准差=5.6);6名(60%)为女性,平均受教育年限为12.4年(标准差=2.4)。基于转录本的分析产生了3种主要作用机制,这些机制导致了对其严重精神疾病和糖尿病自我管理的改善:(科尔顿和曼德施泰德,2006年)积极的群体体验、(奥斯本等人,2008年)健康知识增加以及(纽科默,2005年)自信心增强。
针对患有严重精神疾病和其他合并症的个体进行随机对照试验的复杂干预措施开发,在针对这一弱势群体的医疗保健规划中变得越来越重要。使用定性方法探索定量结果背后的作用机制,可以丰富我们对与患有严重精神疾病和合并症个体相关过程的理解。