Jordan R W, Chapman A W P, Buchanan D, Makrides P
University Hospital, Coventry and Warwickshire, United Kingdom.
University Hospital, Coventry and Warwickshire, United Kingdom.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Feb;24(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
Ankle fractures are one of the most commonly occurring fractures in the elderly population. The overall incidence has been reported to be up to 184 fractures per 100,000 persons per year, of which 20-30% occur in the elderly. Medical co-morbidities, osteoporosis, suboptimal skin quality and poor toleration of non-weight bearing status all contribute to difficulties in managing these injuries in this population. Intramedullary implants are advantageous as they utilise smaller incisions, minimise soft tissue disruption and may allow early weight bearing. This systematic review aims to analyse the use of both fibula nails and talo-tibial-calcaneal (TTC) implants in the management of fragility ankle fractures.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature using the online databases Medline and EMBASE on 26th December 2015. Only studies assessing ankle fractures that were treated with either an intramedullary fibula nail or TTC implant were included. Studies must have reported complications, patient mobility status or a functional outcome measure. Studies were excluded if the intramedullary device utilised was an adjunct to plate fixation or where a variety of surgical treatments were included in the study. The included studies were appraised with respect to a validated quality assessment scale.
Our search strategy produced 350 studies although only 17 studies met inclusion criteria; ten assessed a fibula nail and seven assessed a standard hindfoot nail, a TTC implant. 15 studies were case series, the overall quality of the studies was low and only one randomised controlled trial was reviewed. The mean Olerud and Molander Ankle Score for fibula nail studies ranged from 58 to 97 and the complication rate from 0 to 22%. Two comparative studies reported a statistically significant increase in complication rate with plate fixation but similar functional outcomes. Studies assessing TTC implants reported a mean Olerud and Molander Ankle Score of 50-62 and complication rate from 18 to 22.6%.
The studies reviewed suggest that fibula nails may be capable of producing similar functional outcomes with lower rates of complications to plate fixation. TTC implants produce lower functional outcomes but this may be acceptable in a subgroup of patients at high risk or with reduced pre-injury mobility. However, the low quality of evidence reviewed, the variation in patients included, implant used and outcome scores measured restricts the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Further comparative studies are required to explore the role of these implants further.
踝关节骨折是老年人群中最常见的骨折之一。据报道,总体发病率高达每年每10万人中有184例骨折,其中20% - 30%发生在老年人中。合并症、骨质疏松、皮肤质量欠佳以及对非负重状态耐受性差等因素,均导致对该人群骨折的处理存在困难。髓内植入物具有优势,因为它们切口较小,软组织损伤最小,并且可能允许早期负重。本系统评价旨在分析腓骨钉和距骨 - 胫骨 - 跟骨(TTC)植入物在脆性踝关节骨折治疗中的应用。
2015年12月26日,我们使用在线数据库Medline和EMBASE对文献进行了系统评价。仅纳入评估采用髓内腓骨钉或TTC植入物治疗的踝关节骨折的研究。研究必须报告并发症、患者活动状态或功能结局指标。如果所使用的髓内装置是钢板固定的辅助装置,或者研究中包含多种手术治疗方法,则排除该研究。纳入的研究依据经过验证的质量评估量表进行评价。
我们的检索策略共检索到350项研究,但只有17项研究符合纳入标准;10项评估了腓骨钉,7项评估了标准后足钉,即TTC植入物。15项研究为病例系列研究,研究的总体质量较低,仅审查了1项随机对照试验。腓骨钉研究的Olerud和Molander踝关节平均评分范围为58至97,并发症发生率为0至22%。两项比较研究报告,钢板固定的并发症发生率有统计学意义的增加,但功能结局相似。评估TTC植入物的研究报告,Olerud和Molander踝关节平均评分为50 - 62,并发症发生率为18%至22.6%。
所审查的研究表明,与钢板固定相比,腓骨钉可能能够产生相似的功能结局,且并发症发生率较低。TTC植入物产生的功能结局较低,但在高危或伤前活动能力降低的亚组患者中可能是可以接受的。然而,所审查证据的质量较低,纳入患者、使用的植入物和测量的结局评分存在差异,限制了得出明确结论的能力。需要进一步的比较研究来进一步探索这些植入物的作用。