Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.
Respir Med. 2018 Feb;135:12-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
Respiratory disease is a common co-morbidity with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA commonly affects the hands, but there is little research investigating whether these patients are physically able to operate inhalers.
To compare the physical ability of people with and without RA to use four commonly prescribed inhaler devices (pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI), Easi-Breathe, HandiHaler and Turbohaler).
Adults with RA and an equal number of age-sex matched controls were observed using placebo inhaler devices. Maximum inhalation flow rate was measured with an In-Check Dial device. Dichotomous data were compared (RA versus control) using Fisher's exact test.
Thirty four participants were recruited for each group. For all inhalers, fewer participants with RA were able to complete all the steps necessary to operate the device: pMDI (50% vs. 91%), Easi-Breathe (77% vs. 97%), HandiHaler (15% vs. 94%) and Turbohaler (85% vs. 100%). This difference was significant (p < .05) for the pMDI, Easi-Breathe and HandiHaler. Significantly fewer people (p < .05) with RA were able to depress the pMDI canister, or to complete three steps in the operation of the Handihaler (open the dust cap, remove the capsule from its blister, pierce the capsule). Only one participant (RA group) was unable to achieve the minimum flow rates required to operate the Turbohaler and HandiHaler (p = 1.000).
People with RA have varying physical abilities to use inhalers effectively. A person-centred approach is required to assess which inhaler device is appropriate for each individual patient.
呼吸疾病是类风湿关节炎(RA)的常见合并症。RA 通常会影响手部,但很少有研究调查这些患者是否能够实际操作吸入器。
比较有和没有 RA 的人使用四种常用处方吸入器(压力定量吸入器(pMDI)、Easi-Breathe、HandiHaler 和 Turbohaler)的身体能力。
使用安慰剂吸入器观察患有 RA 的成年人和年龄性别匹配的对照组。使用 In-Check Dial 设备测量最大吸入流速。使用 Fisher 确切检验比较二分类数据(RA 与对照组)。
每组招募了 34 名参与者。对于所有吸入器,能够完成操作设备所需的所有步骤的 RA 参与者较少:pMDI(50%对 91%)、Easi-Breathe(77%对 97%)、HandiHaler(15%对 94%)和 Turbohaler(85%对 100%)。这在 pMDI、Easi-Breathe 和 HandiHaler 中差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。能够按下 pMDI 罐的 RA 患者明显较少(p<0.05),或者能够完成 Handihaler 操作的三个步骤(打开防尘帽、从其泡罩中取出胶囊、刺穿胶囊)。只有一名参与者(RA 组)无法达到操作 Turbohaler 和 HandiHaler 所需的最小流速(p=1.000)。
RA 患者使用吸入器的身体能力各不相同。需要采用以患者为中心的方法来评估哪种吸入器设备适合每个个体患者。