• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向澳大利亚临床质量登记处的战略。

Towards a strategy for clinical quality registries in Australia.

作者信息

Ahern Susannah, Evans Sue, Hopper Ingrid, Zalcberg John

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: ;

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):284-287. doi: 10.1071/AH17201.

DOI:10.1071/AH17201
PMID:29415798
Abstract

The healthcare value of Australian clinical quality registries (CQRs) has recently been highlighted by the Australian Commission of Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) as being similar to the benefits of CQRs reported internationally. However, the development of CQRs in Australia is currently limited by a lack of coordination and strategic planning, leading to governance and funding processes that are varied and non-sustainable. Despite this, Australia has achieved recognised success with exemplar clinical registries where funding has been sustained at least partly by public funds. To this end, Australia can learn from international CQR governance and funding models to support CQR sustainability, most notably those from European and Scandinavian countries. Further, following the release of the ACSQHC's prioritised domains for CQRs and anticipated funding from the Medical Research Future Fund, the ACSQHC is well positioned to lead a national strategic approach for clinical registries. Together with medical leadership and engagement, operational and data management support from the jurisdictions and financial support from both the public and private sectors, a prioritised and coordinated approach may soon become a reality.

摘要

澳大利亚医疗保健质量登记处(CQRs)的医疗保健价值最近被澳大利亚医疗保健安全与质量委员会(ACSQHC)强调,认为与国际上报告的CQRs的益处相似。然而,澳大利亚CQRs的发展目前受到缺乏协调和战略规划的限制,导致治理和资金流程各不相同且不可持续。尽管如此,澳大利亚在一些典范性临床登记处取得了公认的成功,这些登记处的资金至少部分由公共资金维持。为此,澳大利亚可以借鉴国际CQRs治理和资金模式来支持CQRs的可持续性,最值得注意的是来自欧洲和斯堪的纳维亚国家的模式。此外,在ACSQHC发布了CQRs的优先领域以及医学研究未来基金的预期资金之后,ACSQHC完全有能力引领临床登记处的国家战略方法。加上医学领域的领导和参与、各司法管辖区的运营和数据管理支持以及公共和私营部门的财政支持,一种优先且协调的方法可能很快成为现实。

相似文献

1
Towards a strategy for clinical quality registries in Australia.迈向澳大利亚临床质量登记处的战略。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):284-287. doi: 10.1071/AH17201.
2
Cross-sectional study of characteristics of clinical registries in Australia: a resource for clinicians and policy makers.澳大利亚临床注册特征的横断面研究:临床医生和政策制定者的资源。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 1;30(3):192-199. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx196.
3
Clinical quality registries: urgent reform is required to enable best practice and best care.临床质量登记处:需要进行紧急改革,以实现最佳实践和最佳护理。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jan;92(1-2):23-26. doi: 10.1111/ans.17438. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review.临床质量登记处的经济评价:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030984.
5
The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review.澳大利亚临床质量登记处在孕期护理中的作用:一项范围综述。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;62(4):472-482. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13540. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Preliminary development of recommendations for the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical quality registries.患者报告结局测量纳入临床质量登记研究的建议的初步制定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07657-4.
7
End-of-life care in hospital: an audit of care against Australian national guidelines.医院临终关怀:对照澳大利亚国家指南进行的护理审核
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Oct;43(5):578-584. doi: 10.1071/AH18215.
8
An overview of Clinical Quality Registries (CQRs) on gynecological oncology worldwide.全球妇科肿瘤临床质量登记处(CQRs)概述。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;48(10):2094-2103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.020. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
9
Stakeholder views of the development of a clinical quality registry for interventional radiology: a qualitative study.利益相关者对介入放射学临床质量登记处发展的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 9;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07423-y.
10
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to using feedback from clinical quality registries: a scoping review protocol.使用临床质量登记处反馈的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 4;13(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02693-z.
2
Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into a clinical quality registry (CQR) for ovarian cancer: considerations and challenges.将患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)纳入卵巢癌临床质量登记系统(CQR):考虑因素和挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11042-8.
3
Integrated Management Systems (IMS) to Support and Sustain Quality One Health Services: International Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic by the IMIA Primary Care Working Group.
一体化管理系统(IMS)支持和维持全健康服务质量:国际医疗信息学协会初级保健工作组从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的经验教训。
Yearb Med Inform. 2023 Aug;32(1):55-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768725. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Estimating the cost-effectiveness and return on investment of the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry in Australia: a minimum threshold analysis.评估澳大利亚维多利亚心脏结局注册研究的成本效益和投资回报:最小阈值分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e066106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066106.
5
Hereditary Endocrine Tumor Registries.遗传性内分泌肿瘤登记处。
J Endocr Soc. 2022 Dec 23;7(3):bvac194. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvac194. eCollection 2023 Jan 6.
6
Preliminary development of recommendations for the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical quality registries.患者报告结局测量纳入临床质量登记研究的建议的初步制定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07657-4.
7
Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries.为临床质量登记中纳入患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的指南制定初步概念框架。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Dec 10;10:355-372. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S229569. eCollection 2019.
8
Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review.临床质量登记处的经济评价:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030984.
9
The Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR): a clinical quality registry to monitor and improve care in upper gastrointestinal cancers.上消化道癌症登记处(UGICR):一个临床质量登记处,用于监测和改善上消化道癌症的治疗。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):e031434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031434.