• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉学控制塔:支持转化的可行性评估(ACT-FAST)——一项可行性研究方案

Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)-a feasibility study protocol.

作者信息

Murray-Torres Teresa M, Wallace Frances, Bollini Mara, Avidan Michael S, Politi Mary C

机构信息

1Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, Camps Box 8054, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.

2Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jan 25;4:38. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0233-4. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-018-0233-4
PMID:29416871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5785885/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major postoperative morbidity and mortality remain common despite efforts to improve patient outcomes. Health information technologies have the potential to actualize advances in perioperative patient care, but failure to evaluate the usability of these technologies may hinder their implementation and acceptance. This protocol describes the usability testing of an innovative telemedicine-based intra-operative clinical support system, the Anesthesiology Control Tower, in which a team led by an attending anesthesiologist will use a combination of established and novel information technologies to provide evidence-based support to their colleagues in the operating room.

METHODS

Two phases of mixed-methods usability testing will be conducted in an iterative manner and will evaluate both the individual components of the Anesthesiology Control Tower and their integration as a whole. Phase I testing will employ two separate "think-aloud" protocol analyses with the two groups of end users. Segments will be coded and analyzed for usability issues. Phase II will involve a qualitative and quantitative in situ usability and feasibility analysis. Results from each phase will inform the revision and improvement of the Control Tower prototype throughout our testing and analysis process. The final prototype will be evaluated in the form of a pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial.

DISCUSSION

The Anesthesiology Control Tower has the potential to revolutionize the standard of care for perioperative medicine. Through the thorough and iterative usability testing process described in this protocol, we will maximize the usefulness of this novel technology for our clinicians, thus improving our ability to implement this innovation into the model of care for perioperative medicine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study that this protocol describes has been registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02830126.

摘要

背景

尽管人们努力改善患者预后,但术后严重发病和死亡情况仍然常见。健康信息技术有潜力实现围手术期患者护理的进展,但未能评估这些技术的可用性可能会阻碍其实施和接受。本方案描述了一种基于远程医疗的创新术中临床支持系统——麻醉控制塔的可用性测试,在该系统中,由主治麻醉师领导的团队将使用既定和新颖的信息技术组合,为手术室中的同事提供循证支持。

方法

将以迭代方式进行两个阶段的混合方法可用性测试,评估麻醉控制塔的各个组件及其整体集成情况。第一阶段测试将对两组最终用户采用两种单独的“出声思考”协议分析。对片段进行编码并分析可用性问题。第二阶段将涉及定性和定量的现场可用性和可行性分析。每个阶段的结果将为在整个测试和分析过程中对控制塔原型的修订和改进提供依据。最终原型将以实用随机对照临床试验的形式进行评估。

讨论

麻醉控制塔有可能彻底改变围手术期医学的护理标准。通过本方案中描述的全面且迭代的可用性测试过程,我们将最大限度地提高这项新技术对临床医生的实用性,从而提高我们将这项创新纳入围手术期医学护理模式的能力。

试验注册

本方案描述的研究已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT02830126。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/5785885/647fb681bd34/40814_2018_233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/5785885/19a01aad6411/40814_2018_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/5785885/f6d992975f7f/40814_2018_233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/5785885/647fb681bd34/40814_2018_233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/5785885/19a01aad6411/40814_2018_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/5785885/f6d992975f7f/40814_2018_233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/5785885/647fb681bd34/40814_2018_233_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)-a feasibility study protocol.麻醉学控制塔:支持转化的可行性评估(ACT-FAST)——一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jan 25;4:38. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0233-4. eCollection 2018.
2
Anesthesiology Control Tower-Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACTFAST): Mixed-Methods Study of a Novel Telemedicine-Based Support System for the Operating Room.麻醉学控制塔——支持转化的可行性评估(ACTFAST):一种基于远程医疗的新型手术室支持系统的混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Apr 23;6(2):e12155. doi: 10.2196/12155.
3
Study protocol for the Anesthesiology Control Tower-Feedback Alerts to Supplement Treatments (ACTFAST-3) trial: a pilot randomized controlled trial in intraoperative telemedicine.麻醉学控制塔-补充治疗反馈警报(ACTFAST-3)试验的研究方案:一项术中远程医疗的试点随机对照试验。
F1000Res. 2018 May 22;7:623. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14897.2. eCollection 2018.
4
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
5
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
6
Protocol for the Effectiveness of an Anesthesiology Control Tower System in Improving Perioperative Quality Metrics and Clinical Outcomes: the TECTONICS randomized, pragmatic trial.麻醉学控制塔系统改善围手术期质量指标和临床结局有效性的方案:TECTONICS随机实用试验
F1000Res. 2019 Nov 29;8:2032. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21016.1. eCollection 2019.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

引用本文的文献

1
An Intraoperative Telemedicine Program to Improve Perioperative Quality Measures: The ACTFAST-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.术中远程医疗计划提高围手术期质量措施:ACTFAST-3 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2332517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32517.
2
An ethnographic study on the impact of a novel telemedicine-based support system in the operating room.基于民族志的研究:新型远程医疗支持系统在手术室中的影响
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1919-1930. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac138.
3
Exploring patient perspectives on telemedicine monitoring within the operating room.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral Modification of Intraoperative Hyperglycemia Management with a Novel Real-time Audiovisual Monitor.使用新型实时视听监测器对术中高血糖管理进行行为修正。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):29-37. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000699.
2
Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.电子病历界面设计中的可用性与安全性:近期文献综述与指南制定
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):805-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720815576827. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
3
What evidence is there for intraoperative predictors of perioperative cardiac outcomes? A systematic review.
探讨患者对手术室远程医疗监测的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Dec;156:104595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104595. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
4
Protocol for a proof-of-concept observational study evaluating the potential utility and acceptability of a telemedicine solution for the post-anesthesia care unit.用于评估远程医疗解决方案在麻醉后护理单元的潜在实用性和可接受性的概念验证观察性研究方案。
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 20;9:1261. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26794.1. eCollection 2020.
5
Protocol for the Effectiveness of an Anesthesiology Control Tower System in Improving Perioperative Quality Metrics and Clinical Outcomes: the TECTONICS randomized, pragmatic trial.麻醉学控制塔系统改善围手术期质量指标和临床结局有效性的方案:TECTONICS随机实用试验
F1000Res. 2019 Nov 29;8:2032. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21016.1. eCollection 2019.
6
Deep-learning model for predicting 30-day postoperative mortality.深度学习模型预测 30 天术后死亡率。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
Remote Surveillance Technologies: Realizing the Aim of Right Patient, Right Data, Right Time.远程监测技术:实现“正确的患者、正确的数据、正确的时间”的目标。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Sep;129(3):726-734. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003948.
8
Anesthesiology Control Tower-Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACTFAST): Mixed-Methods Study of a Novel Telemedicine-Based Support System for the Operating Room.麻醉学控制塔——支持转化的可行性评估(ACTFAST):一种基于远程医疗的新型手术室支持系统的混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Apr 23;6(2):e12155. doi: 10.2196/12155.
术中预测围术期心脏结局的证据有哪些?系统评价。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2013 Jul 3;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-14.
4
Anesthesia information management system-based near real-time decision support to manage intraoperative hypotension and hypertension.基于麻醉信息管理系统的近实时决策支持,以管理术中低血压和高血压。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jan;118(1):206-14. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000027.
5
Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.开发和评估通用 ACS NSQIP 手术风险计算器:为患者和外科医生提供的决策辅助和知情同意工具。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
6
Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension.非心脏手术后术中平均动脉压与临床结局的关系:低血压的实证定义。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):507-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26.
7
Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.通过提高电子健康记录系统的可用性来增强患者安全和护理质量:AMIA 的建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e2-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
8
Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support.将可用性测试和出声思维协议分析与“近乎实时”的临床模拟相结合,评估临床决策支持。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
9
Emerging approaches to usability evaluation of health information systems: towards in-situ analysis of complex healthcare systems and environments.健康信息系统可用性评估的新方法:迈向复杂医疗系统与环境的现场分析
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:915-9.
10
TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability.TURF:迈向 EHR 可用性的统一框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44(6):1056-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Aug 16.