Scharl Sophia, Papathemelis Thomas, Kronberger Karin, Gerken Michael, Scharl Anton, Kölbl Oliver, Klinkhammer-Schalke Monika
Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und RadioOnkologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Frauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Mariahilfbergweg 7, 92224, Amberg, Germany.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 May;297(5):1245-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4708-6. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
Adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer varies greatly due to the lack of definitive results from controlled randomized trials on the subject. In a retrospective study, we sought to investigate the influence of post-operative radio-, chemo, and radiochemotherapy on survival time and recurrence rates among high-grade endometrial cancer patients.
284 high-grade endometrial cancer patients (FIGOI-III, or unknown classification) diagnosed between 1998 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent surgery. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence rates were compared for post-operative treatment modalities of radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (CTX), radiochemotherapy (RCT), and observation (OBS).
Post-operative RCT and RT resulted in a significantly improved 5-year OS of 94.1% (HR 0.104, CI 0.013-0.809) and 62.1% (HR 0.615, CI 0.390-0.969), respectively, compared to 43.6% for OBS. CTX did not significantly improve OS leading to a 5-year OS of 56.5% (HR 0.783, CI 0.224-2.740). 5-year recurrence rate was lowest for patients treated with RCT (5.3%). 5-year RFS was 94.1% for the RCT group and proved to be significantly superior to 58.8% for RT (HR 9.034, CI 1.184-68.948), 56% for CTX (HR 12.738, CI 1.337-121.346), and 37.4% for OBS (HR 16.407, CI 2.127-126.575), respectively. In comparison with OBS, RT alone resulted in a significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.551, CI 0.354-0.856).
Our retrospective population-based study indicates a survival benefit from treating high-grade endometrial cancer with post-operative RCT. Randomized controlled trials are needed to minimize potential confounding parameters and further clarify the subject.
由于关于该主题的对照随机试验缺乏明确结果,高级别子宫内膜癌的辅助治疗差异很大。在一项回顾性研究中,我们试图调查术后放疗、化疗和放化疗对高级别子宫内膜癌患者生存时间和复发率的影响。
回顾性分析了1998年至2015年间诊断的284例高级别子宫内膜癌患者(国际妇产科联盟分期I - III期,或分类不明)。所有患者均接受了手术。比较了单纯放疗(RT)、单纯化疗(CTX)、放化疗(RCT)和观察(OBS)等术后治疗方式的总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和复发率。
与观察组的5年总生存率43.6%相比,术后放化疗和放疗的5年总生存率显著提高,分别为94.1%(风险比0.104,置信区间0.013 - 0.809)和62.1%(风险比0.615,置信区间0.390 - 0.969)。单纯化疗未显著提高总生存率,5年总生存率为56.5%(风险比0.783,置信区间0.224 - 2.740)。接受放化疗的患者5年复发率最低(5.3%)。放化疗组的5年无复发生存率为94.1%,明显优于放疗组的58.8%(风险比9.034,置信区间1.184 - 68.948)、化疗组的56%(风险比12.738,置信区间1.337 - 121.346)和观察组的37.4%(风险比16.407,置信区间2.127 - 126.575)。与观察组相比,单纯放疗显著提高了无复发生存率(风险比0.551,置信区间0.354 - 0.856)。
我们基于人群的回顾性研究表明,术后放化疗治疗高级别子宫内膜癌可带来生存获益。需要进行随机对照试验以尽量减少潜在的混杂因素并进一步阐明该问题。