• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“总有更好的办法”:加拿大新型抗癌药物决策中的不确定性管理

"There is always a better way": Managing uncertainty in decision making about new cancer drugs in Canada.

作者信息

Driedger S Michelle, Cooper Elizabeth, Annable Gary, Brouwers Melissa

机构信息

Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):e485-e499. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2492. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.2492
PMID:29417619
Abstract

Policy decisions about the approval and funding of new cancer drugs must often be made in an environment of complex uncertainty about clinical and cost-effectiveness data. The focus of this article is on the results from qualitative interviews with senior officials (n = 16) who make decisions about or influence cancer drug policy in various organizations in the Canadian cancer control system. Most participants identified the use of a limited number of informal approaches to address uncertainty, such as grounding decisions in evidence and advice from expert groups. People tended to focus on evidence informed decisions including price negotiations, the ability to implement policy changes, and stakeholder values. Lessons from the Canadian context related to continuing efforts to build a public culture of understanding into how policy decisions like cancer drug funding are made may result in greater acceptance and increased confidence in health policy decision-making processes across multiple sectors internationally.

摘要

关于新癌症药物的批准和资金投入的政策决策,往往是在临床和成本效益数据存在复杂不确定性的环境中做出的。本文的重点是对高级官员(n = 16)进行定性访谈的结果,这些官员在加拿大癌症控制系统的各个组织中负责做出或影响癌症药物政策的决策。大多数参与者指出,他们采用了有限的几种非正式方法来应对不确定性,例如将决策基于证据以及专家小组的建议。人们倾向于关注基于证据的决策,包括价格谈判、实施政策变革的能力以及利益相关者的价值观。加拿大的经验教训表明,持续努力在癌症药物资金等政策决策的制定过程中营造一种公众理解的文化,可能会在国际上多个部门提高对卫生政策决策过程的接受度并增强信心。

相似文献

1
"There is always a better way": Managing uncertainty in decision making about new cancer drugs in Canada.“总有更好的办法”:加拿大新型抗癌药物决策中的不确定性管理
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):e485-e499. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2492. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
3
Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.解决癌症药物可负担性问题:利用审议式公众参与为卫生政策提供信息。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0411-8.
4
Use of real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions in Canada: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives.加拿大癌症药物资助决策中真实世界证据的应用:对利益相关者观点的定性研究
CMAJ Open. 2020 Nov 24;8(4):E772-E778. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200118. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
5
Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.利用有效性和成本效益来做出药物覆盖范围决策:英国、澳大利亚和加拿大的比较
JAMA. 2009 Oct 7;302(13):1437-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1409.
6
How do cost-effectiveness analyses inform reimbursement decisions for oncology medicines in Canada? The example of sunitinib for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.成本效益分析如何为加拿大肿瘤药物的报销决策提供信息?以舒尼替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗为例。
Value Health. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(6):837-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00738.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
7
Evidence, values, and funding decisions in Canadian cancer systems.加拿大癌症系统中的证据、价值观与资金决策。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2019 Nov;32(6):293-298. doi: 10.1177/0840470419870831. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
8
Describing Sources of Uncertainty in Cancer Drug Formulary Priority Setting across Canada.描述加拿大癌症药物处方集优先设置中不确定性的来源。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jul 17;28(4):2708-2719. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040236.
9
The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond.经济证据在加拿大肿瘤学报销决策中的作用:从拉姆达到更远。
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):771-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00298.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
10
Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration.开发将真实世界证据纳入癌症药物资助决策框架:加拿大癌症药物价值的真实世界证据(CanREValue)合作。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e032884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884.

引用本文的文献

1
Public perceptions of high-cost cancer drugs and the implications for reimbursement decisions.公众对高成本抗癌药物的认知及其对报销决策的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00659-y.
2
Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.加拿大癌症药物资助流程的决定因素。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 15;29(3):1997-2007. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030162.
3
Describing Sources of Uncertainty in Cancer Drug Formulary Priority Setting across Canada.描述加拿大癌症药物处方集优先设置中不确定性的来源。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jul 17;28(4):2708-2719. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040236.