Driedger S Michelle, Cooper Elizabeth, Annable Gary, Brouwers Melissa
Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):e485-e499. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2492. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
Policy decisions about the approval and funding of new cancer drugs must often be made in an environment of complex uncertainty about clinical and cost-effectiveness data. The focus of this article is on the results from qualitative interviews with senior officials (n = 16) who make decisions about or influence cancer drug policy in various organizations in the Canadian cancer control system. Most participants identified the use of a limited number of informal approaches to address uncertainty, such as grounding decisions in evidence and advice from expert groups. People tended to focus on evidence informed decisions including price negotiations, the ability to implement policy changes, and stakeholder values. Lessons from the Canadian context related to continuing efforts to build a public culture of understanding into how policy decisions like cancer drug funding are made may result in greater acceptance and increased confidence in health policy decision-making processes across multiple sectors internationally.
关于新癌症药物的批准和资金投入的政策决策,往往是在临床和成本效益数据存在复杂不确定性的环境中做出的。本文的重点是对高级官员(n = 16)进行定性访谈的结果,这些官员在加拿大癌症控制系统的各个组织中负责做出或影响癌症药物政策的决策。大多数参与者指出,他们采用了有限的几种非正式方法来应对不确定性,例如将决策基于证据以及专家小组的建议。人们倾向于关注基于证据的决策,包括价格谈判、实施政策变革的能力以及利益相关者的价值观。加拿大的经验教训表明,持续努力在癌症药物资金等政策决策的制定过程中营造一种公众理解的文化,可能会在国际上多个部门提高对卫生政策决策过程的接受度并增强信心。