Suppr超能文献

从基础层面看出版伦理。

Publication ethics from the ground up.

作者信息

DeTora Lisa, Foster Cate, Nori Mukund, Simcoe Donna, Skobe Catherine, Toroser Dikran

机构信息

Writing Studies and Rhetoric, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.

Watermeadow Medical, Witney, NY, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;72(2). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13063. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Abstract

It is relatively easy to begin policy documents with a general assertion that ethics will be followed. Less obvious is how to ensure that day-to-day activities are consonant with ethical standards. We suggest that using day-to-day publication activities as the driver for building policies and procedures can promote ethical practices from the ground up. Although basic principles of ethical publication practice may seem straightforward to some, for others this information may require explanation, interpretation and context. Effective policy development includes big-picture items as well as more day-to-day tactical responsibilities such as those discussed below. Research questions, disciplinary practices, applications and team structures may vary. Thus, no single publication plan or policy solution is right for all teams. It is up to team members to review guidelines for best practices and find the optimal implementation for their situations. Experts in publication management, planning and writing can help large teams manage publication activities. These experts have an obligation to maintain and enhance their skills continually. A strong acumen in publication best practices will allow these publication professionals to better address any possible ethical dilemmas in the future.

摘要

在政策文件开头做出遵循道德规范的一般性断言相对容易。但如何确保日常活动符合道德标准则不那么明显。我们建议,将日常出版活动作为制定政策和程序的驱动力,可以从根本上促进道德行为。尽管道德出版实践的基本原则对一些人来说可能看似简单明了,但对另一些人而言,这些信息可能需要解释、阐释和背景说明。有效的政策制定既包括宏观层面的内容,也包括更多日常的战术职责,如下文所讨论的那些职责。研究问题、学科实践、应用和团队结构可能各不相同。因此,没有一个单一的出版计划或政策解决方案适用于所有团队。团队成员有责任审查最佳实践指南,并找到适合其情况的最佳实施方案。出版管理、规划和写作方面的专家可以帮助大型团队管理出版活动。这些专家有义务不断维护和提升自己的技能。对出版最佳实践有敏锐的洞察力将使这些出版专业人员能够更好地应对未来任何可能出现的道德困境。

相似文献

1
Publication ethics from the ground up.从基础层面看出版伦理。
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;72(2). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13063. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?编辑是如何被挑选、招募和批准的?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1801-1804. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
8
Be a responsible co-author.做一名有责任心的共同作者。
Res Nurs Health. 2014 Feb;37(1):1-2. doi: 10.1002/nur.21580.
10
Writing for publication: a practical guide.撰写论文发表:实用指南。
Nurs Stand. 2008;22(28):35-40. doi: 10.7748/ns2008.03.22.28.35.c6435.

引用本文的文献

1
Updated Editorial Guidance for Quality and Reliability of Research Output.研究成果质量和可靠性的更新编辑指南。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Aug 16;33(35):e247. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e247. eCollection 2018 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

7
Perspectives on clinical trial data transparency and disclosure.关于临床试验数据透明度与披露的观点。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Sep;39(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
8
Open clinical trial data for all? A view from regulators.公开所有临床试验数据?监管者的观点。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001202. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验