Suppr超能文献

羊膜对糖尿病足伤口的生物学效应:一项系统综述。

Biological effects of amniotic membrane on diabetic foot wounds: a systematic review.

作者信息

Paggiaro André Oliveira, Menezes Andriws Garcia, Ferrassi Alexandra Donizetti, De Carvalho Viviane Fernandes, Gemperli Rolf

机构信息

Professor, Guarulhos University, Brazil.

Senior Nursing Student, Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2018 Feb 1;27(Sup2):S19-S25. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.Sup2.S19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The amniotic membrane has biological properties that are beneficial to the wound healing process of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Our aim is to analyse the scientific evidence found in literature on the use of the amniotic membrane to stimulate DFU healing.

METHOD

A systematic review of amniotic membrane's influence was undertaken, using the search terms 'placenta' 'diabetic foot' 'amnion' and biological dressing', assessing the outcomes 'wound healing' and 'wound healing time', in DFU. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, randomised controlled trials (RCT) were identified, and the risk of bias was analysed according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We conducted a meta-analysis of the two outcomes to evaluate the level of evidence.

RESULTS

We identified six clinical trials, with a total of 331 patients. The most common risks of bias in the studies were selection, attrition, and detection biases. From the meta-analysis, the difference of the intervention group (amnion) in relation to the control group was statistically significant. We found that wound healing in the group treated with amniotic membrane occurs 2.32 times more often and is 32 days faster in comparison with the group that used conventional dressings.

CONCLUSION

There is no statistical evidence to support the effectiveness of amniotic membrane in comparison with other conventional dressings. However, there is a clear tendency for the use of amniotic membrane treatment to result in a larger number of DFUs healing at a quicker rate.

摘要

目的

羊膜具有有利于糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)伤口愈合过程的生物学特性。我们的目的是分析文献中关于使用羊膜刺激DFU愈合的科学证据。

方法

对羊膜的影响进行系统评价,使用检索词“胎盘”“糖尿病足”“羊膜”和“生物敷料”,评估DFU的“伤口愈合”和“伤口愈合时间”结果。根据纳入和排除标准,确定随机对照试验(RCT),并根据Cochrane偏倚风险工具分析偏倚风险。我们对这两个结果进行了荟萃分析,以评估证据水平。

结果

我们确定了六项临床试验,共有331名患者。研究中最常见的偏倚风险是选择、损耗和检测偏倚。从荟萃分析来看,干预组(羊膜)与对照组的差异具有统计学意义。我们发现,与使用传统敷料的组相比,使用羊膜治疗的组伤口愈合的发生率高出2.32倍,且快32天。

结论

没有统计证据支持羊膜与其他传统敷料相比的有效性。然而,使用羊膜治疗有明显的趋势,即能使更多的DFU更快愈合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验