Sun Lixin, Zhu Xiaopei, Zou Jianhong, Li Yongchun, Han Wei
Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital Department of Lab, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shibei District of Qingdao Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(6):e9751. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009751.
To evaluate the efficacy between intravenous and oral acetaminophen as adjunct to multimodal analgesia regimens for pain management after total knee and hip arthroplasties.
We conduct electronic searches of Medline (1966-2017.09), PubMed (1966-2017.09), Embase (1980-2017.09), ScienceDirect (1985-2017.09), and the Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are included. The quality assessment is performed according to the Cochrane systematic review method. Fixed/random effect model is adopted according to the heterogeneity tested by I statistic. Meta-analysis is performed using Stata 11.0 software.
Two RCTs are included involving 236 patients. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences between groups regarding pain scores at 12, 24, or 48 hours. No significant differences were observed in terms of opioid consumption at 12, 24, or 48 hours after arthroplasties.
Intravenous acetaminophen to multimodal analgesia dose not demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing pain and opioid consumption compared oral formulation after total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Higher-quality RCTs are required for further research.
评价静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚与口服对乙酰氨基酚作为多模式镇痛方案辅助用药在全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理中的疗效。
我们对Medline(1966 - 2017.09)、PubMed(1966 - 2017.09)、Embase(1980 - 2017.09)、ScienceDirect(1985 - 2017.09)和考科蓝图书馆进行了电子检索。仅纳入随机对照试验(RCT)。根据考科蓝系统评价方法进行质量评估。根据I统计量检验的异质性采用固定/随机效应模型。使用Stata 11.0软件进行荟萃分析。
纳入两项RCT,共236例患者。本荟萃分析表明,两组在12、24或48小时时的疼痛评分无显著差异。关节置换术后12、24或48小时的阿片类药物消耗量方面未观察到显著差异。
在全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术后,与口服制剂相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚用于多模式镇痛在减轻疼痛和减少阿片类药物消耗方面未显示出显著益处。需要更高质量的RCT进行进一步研究。