Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecossistemas Agrícolas e Naturais (PPGEAN), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), 89520-000, Curitibanos, SC, Brazil; Campus of Curitibanos, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), 89520-000, Curitibanos, SC, Brazil.
Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecossistemas Agrícolas e Naturais (PPGEAN), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), 89520-000, Curitibanos, SC, Brazil; Campus of Curitibanos, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), 89520-000, Curitibanos, SC, Brazil.
Chemosphere. 2018 May;198:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.127. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Despite glyphosate-based herbicides are widely used in agriculture, forestry and gardens, little is known about its effects on non-target organisms. The present work evaluated the ecotoxicity of four formulated products (Roundup Original, Trop, Zapp Qi 620 and Crucial) on soil invertebrates. Screening ecotoxicity tests were carried out with soil and oat straw collected in a field experiment, besides laboratory-spiked soils. Screening tests included avoidance behaviour of earthworms (Eisenia andrei), collembolans (Folsomia candida) and isopods (Porcellio dilatatus) in single and multispecies tests; reproduction of collembolans (F. candida), and bait lamina in field. Non-avoidance behaviour was observed in standard tests (earthworms) in soil, neither in multispecies tests (earthworm + isopods) using oat straw, while for collembolans it occurred for the product Zapp Qi 620 even at the recommended dose. Reproduction of F. candida was not impaired even at high doses in laboratory-spiked soils. Feeding activity on bait lamina test was impaired in treatment corresponding to the red label product, Crucial. Results showed the relevance of bait lamina test on screening the impact of herbicides in the field. The findings highlight the importance of considering different formulations for the same active ingredient in risk assessment of pesticides.
尽管草甘膦类除草剂在农业、林业和园林中广泛使用,但对其对非靶标生物的影响知之甚少。本研究评估了四种制剂产品(Roundup Original、Trop、Zapp Qi 620 和 Crucial)对土壤无脊椎动物的生态毒性。在田间试验中收集土壤和燕麦秸秆进行了筛选生态毒性试验,此外还进行了实验室添加土壤的试验。筛选试验包括单一和多物种试验中蚯蚓(Eisenia andrei)、跳虫(Folsomia candida)和马陆(Porcellio dilatatus)的回避行为;跳虫(F. candida)和诱饵片的繁殖,以及田间的繁殖。在标准试验(蚯蚓)中未观察到非回避行为,在使用燕麦秸秆的多物种试验(蚯蚓+马陆)中也未观察到非回避行为,而对于产品 Zapp Qi 620,即使在推荐剂量下也发生了这种情况。即使在实验室添加土壤中高剂量下,F. candida 的繁殖也未受到损害。在对应于红色标签产品 Crucial 的处理中,诱饵片试验中的摄食活性受到了损害。结果表明,诱饵片试验在筛选田间除草剂影响方面具有重要意义。这些发现强调了在农药风险评估中考虑同一有效成分的不同制剂的重要性。