• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening.质量是基于人群的结肠镜筛查新出现问题的关键。
Intest Res. 2018 Jan;16(1):48-54. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.48. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
2
Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening.质量是基于人群的结肠镜筛查新出现问题的关键。
Clin Endosc. 2018 Jan;51(1):50-55. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.010. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
[Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-based Colonoscopy Screening].[质量是基于人群的结肠镜筛查新出现问题的关键]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 25;71(1):3-9. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2018.71.1.3.
4
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
5
6
7
Colon Cancer Screening - Is It Time Yet?结肠癌筛查——是时候了吗?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Jun;27(6):327-328.
8
9
Colonoscopy is the preferred colorectal cancer screening method in a population-based program.结肠镜检查是基于人群的项目中首选的结直肠癌筛查方法。
Endoscopy. 2008 Aug;40(8):650-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077350. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
10
Colonoscopy Quality is the Answer for the Emerging Issue of Interval Cancer.结肠镜检查质量是解决间期癌这一新兴问题的答案。
Intest Res. 2014 Apr;12(2):110-6. doi: 10.5217/ir.2014.12.2.110. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycoproteomics of Gastrointestinal Cancers and Its Use in Clinical Diagnostics.胃肠道癌症的糖蛋白质组学及其在临床诊断中的应用
J Proteome Res. 2025 Jun 6;24(6):2584-2599. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00095. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
The adult large bowel: describing environment morphology for effective biomedical device development.成人大肠:描述环境形态以促进有效的生物医学设备开发。
Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol). 2024 Aug 28;6(3). doi: 10.1088/2516-1091/ad6dbf.
3
Efficacy of colonoscopic re-examination across the entire colon: a randomized controlled trial.结肠镜全结肠复查的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6711-6717. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11298-5. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
Evaluation of the "Burgenland PREvention trial of colorectal cancer Disease with ImmunologiCal Testing" (B-PREDICT)-a population-based colorectal cancer screening program.评估“布尔根兰预防性结直肠癌免疫试验”(B-PREDICT)-一项基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03242-7.
5
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
6
Challenges and Suggestions in the Management of Stomach and Colorectal Cancer in Uzbekistan: The Third Report of the Uzbekistan-Korea Oncology Consortium.乌兹别克斯坦胃结直肠癌管理的挑战和建议:乌兹别克斯坦-韩国肿瘤学联合会的第三次报告。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 12;20(8):5477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085477.
7
Intramural Hematoma and Retroperitoneal Hematoma Following a Routine Colonoscopy: An Uncommon Complication of a Common Procedure.常规结肠镜检查后发生的壁内血肿和腹膜后血肿:一项常见操作的罕见并发症
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 29;16(2):515-520. doi: 10.1159/000525633. eCollection 2022 May-Aug.
8
Comment on " Positive fecal immunochemical test results are associated with non-colorectal cancer mortality".关于《粪便免疫化学检测结果呈阳性与非结直肠癌死亡率相关》的评论
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(2):264-265. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.042. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
9
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality.结肠镜检查的质量指标:理想与现实之间的差距。
Clin Endosc. 2022 May;55(3):332-338. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.037. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
10
Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention Policies: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.胃肠道癌症预防政策:一项定性系统评价与元综合分析
Int J Prev Med. 2022 Jan 19;13:8. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_419_20. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Colonoscopy vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM): Rationale for Study Design.结肠镜检查与粪便免疫化学检测对降低结直肠癌死亡率的比较研究(CONFIRM):研究设计原理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;112(11):1736-1746. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.286. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
Patients' Preferences for Primary Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Survey of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.患者对原发性结直肠癌筛查的偏好:韩国国家结直肠癌筛查计划的调查。
Gut Liver. 2017 Nov 15;11(6):821-827. doi: 10.5009/gnl17025.
3
Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies.连续结肠镜检查中结直肠肿瘤性息肉的漏诊率及息肉漏诊的危险因素。
Intest Res. 2017 Jul;15(3):411-418. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?确定韩国人群结肠镜息肉切除术后的最佳监测间隔?
Intest Res. 2017 Jan;15(1):109-117. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.109. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
5
Colorectal cancer screening: Systematic review of screen-related morbidity and mortality.结直肠癌筛查:与筛查相关的发病率和死亡率的系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Mar;54:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study.筛查结肠镜检查在降低左右结肠癌死亡风险中的有效性:一项基于社区的大型研究。
Gut. 2018 Feb;67(2):291-298. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312712. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2576-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332.
8
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于人群的结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.
9
Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)和结肠镜检查的外展邀请可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项在安全网医疗系统中的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):456-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29770. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Differences in Colonoscopy Quality Among Facilities: Development of a Post-Colonoscopy Risk-Standardized Rate of Unplanned Hospital Visits.医疗机构间结肠镜检查质量的差异:制定结肠镜检查后风险标准化未计划住院就诊率。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):103-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

质量是基于人群的结肠镜筛查新出现问题的关键。

Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening.

作者信息

Yoon Jin Young, Cha Jae Myung, Jeen Yoon Tae

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Intest Res. 2018 Jan;16(1):48-54. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.48. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

DOI:10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.48
PMID:29422797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5797271/
Abstract

Colonoscopy is currently regarded as the gold standard and preferred method of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the benefit of colonoscopy screening may be blunted by low participation rates in population-based screening programs. Harmful effects of population-based colonoscopy screening may include complications induced by colonoscopy itself and by sedation, psychosocial distress, potential over-diagnosis, and socioeconomic burden. In addition, harmful effects of colonoscopy may increase with age and comorbidities. As the risk of adverse events in population-based colonoscopy screening may offset the benefit, the adverse events should be managed and monitored. To adopt population-based colonoscopy screening, consensus on the risks and benefits should be developed, focusing on potential harm, patient preference, socioeconomic considerations, and quality improvement of colonoscopy, as well as efficacy for CRC prevention. As suboptimal colonoscopy quality is a major pitfall of population-based screening, adequate training and regulation of screening colonoscopists should be the first step in minimizing variations in quality. Gastroenterologists should promote quality improvement, auditing, and training for colonoscopy in a population-based screening program.

摘要

结肠镜检查目前被视为结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的金标准和首选方法。然而,基于人群的筛查项目中参与率较低可能会削弱结肠镜检查筛查的益处。基于人群的结肠镜检查筛查的有害影响可能包括结肠镜检查本身及镇静引起的并发症、心理社会困扰、潜在的过度诊断以及社会经济负担。此外,结肠镜检查的有害影响可能会随着年龄和合并症的增加而增加。由于基于人群的结肠镜检查筛查中不良事件的风险可能会抵消其益处,因此应对不良事件进行管理和监测。为了采用基于人群的结肠镜检查筛查,应就风险和益处达成共识,重点关注潜在危害、患者偏好、社会经济因素、结肠镜检查质量的改善以及预防CRC的效果。由于结肠镜检查质量欠佳是基于人群筛查的一个主要缺陷,对筛查结肠镜检查医师进行充分培训和监管应是最大限度减少质量差异的第一步。胃肠病学家应在基于人群的筛查项目中促进结肠镜检查的质量改进、审核和培训。