Dupont E, Schandene L, Denys C, Wybran J
Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1986 Sep;40(3):422-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(86)90186-8.
In vitro effects of three immunosuppressive drugs, cyclosporin, methylprednisolone, and 6-mercaptopurine (the active moiety of azathioprine), have been assessed by various proliferative assays including mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), concanavalin A (Con A), OKT3 monoclonal antibody (MoAb), phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), and A23187 ionophore-induced mitogenesis. The influence of these drugs on the capacity to produce interleukin-2 (IL-2) after phytohemagglutinin (PHA) induction has also been evaluated. Depending upon the nature of the stimulus used, differences were found among the three immunosuppressive drugs, suggesting that different T-cell activation mechanisms are involved. The response to alloantigens (MLR) or to mitogens (Con A and OKT3 MoAb) resulted in significant inhibition by all three immunosuppressive agents, although 6-mercaptopurine was somewhat less potent at the pharmacological concentration of 0.1 microgram/ml. When PMA (which activates cells through protein kinase C) and A23187 ionophore (which enhances Ca2+ influx into the cytoplasm through membrane channels) were used, dissociations were observed, suggesting that drugs act differentially on early stages of T-cell activation. Inhibition of PMA-induced activation by cyclosporin was very limited in contrast to the potent effect of methylprednisolone. The latter drug could thus preferentially affect an activation step involving the PMA receptor. Furthermore, the inhibitory influence of methylprednisolone on A23187 ionophore-induced proliferation was equivalent to that of cyclosporin, while 6-mercaptopurine had no effect except at the high concentration of 1 microgram/ml in which direct inhibition of DNA replication is probably involved. IL-2 production induced by PHA was strongly blocked by methylprednisolone and cyclosporin but not by 6-mercaptopurine, at least when a pharmacological concentration was used. In view of the relative independence of ionophore-induced activation from the influence of IL-2, this response could be linked to the intrinsic mechanism of antiproliferative activity of immunosuppressive drugs which probably act mostly at the level of IL-2 production. These results also provide a cellular approach to the synergies between immunosuppressive drugs. Most of the tests are more strongly affected by cyclosporin than by 6-mercaptopurine, probably explaining the potent steroid-sparing effect of cyclosporin.
通过包括混合淋巴细胞反应(MLR)、刀豆蛋白A(Con A)、OKT3单克隆抗体(MoAb)、佛波酯(PMA)和A23187离子载体诱导的有丝分裂等多种增殖试验,评估了三种免疫抑制药物环孢素、甲泼尼龙和6-巯基嘌呤(硫唑嘌呤的活性部分)的体外效应。还评估了这些药物对植物血凝素(PHA)诱导后产生白细胞介素-2(IL-2)能力的影响。根据所使用刺激的性质,发现这三种免疫抑制药物之间存在差异,表明涉及不同的T细胞激活机制。对同种异体抗原(MLR)或有丝分裂原(Con A和OKT3 MoAb)的反应导致所有三种免疫抑制剂均有显著抑制作用,尽管在0.1微克/毫升的药理浓度下,6-巯基嘌呤的效力稍低。当使用PMA(通过蛋白激酶C激活细胞)和A23187离子载体(通过膜通道增强Ca2+流入细胞质)时,观察到了差异,表明药物对T细胞激活的早期阶段有不同作用。与甲泼尼龙的强效作用相比,环孢素对PMA诱导激活的抑制作用非常有限。因此,后一种药物可能优先影响涉及PMA受体的激活步骤。此外,甲泼尼龙对A23187离子载体诱导增殖的抑制作用与环孢素相当,而6-巯基嘌呤除了在1微克/毫升的高浓度下(可能涉及对DNA复制的直接抑制)外没有作用。PHA诱导的IL-2产生至少在使用药理浓度时被甲泼尼龙和环孢素强烈阻断,但未被6-巯基嘌呤阻断。鉴于离子载体诱导的激活与IL-2的影响相对独立,这种反应可能与免疫抑制药物的抗增殖活性内在机制有关,免疫抑制药物可能主要在IL-2产生水平起作用。这些结果还为免疫抑制药物之间的协同作用提供了一种细胞方法。大多数试验受环孢素的影响比受6-巯基嘌呤的影响更大,这可能解释了环孢素强大的激素节省作用。