Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):413-425. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4710-5. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
Results from clinical trials of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer are inconsistent.
A systematic search of MEDLINE identified studies comparing the efficacy of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy to a standard treatment. The primary analysis included studies that used identical regimens in the experimental and control groups, but varied only dose density. A secondary analysis included studies that used either different drugs or doses in the experimental and the control groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were computed for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and pooled in a meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression explored drug schedules utilized in control groups and the influence of clinicopathologic variables on benefit from dose-dense therapy.
The primary analysis included 5 studies comprising 9819 patients while the secondary analysis included 6 studies comprising 9679 patients. Dose-dense treatment significantly improved DFS (HR 0.85, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.86, p = 0.008) in the primary analysis. Similar results were observed in the secondary analysis. Dose-dense schedule was important primarily in studies utilizing paclitaxel every 3 weeks as the control group (interaction p = 0.04 for DFS interaction p = 0.001 for OS). A significantly greater relative magnitude of benefit was observed in pre-menopausal women and those with nodal involvement, but there was no influence of hormone receptor status on results.
Adjuvant dose-dense regimens improve breast cancer outcomes. It remains uncertain whether the observed benefit reflects the impact of dose density or the inferiority of paclitaxel every 3 weeks as a control group.
乳腺癌辅助剂量密集化疗临床试验的结果不一致。
系统检索 MEDLINE 数据库,以确定比较剂量密集辅助化疗与标准治疗疗效的研究。主要分析包括实验组和对照组使用相同方案,但仅剂量密度不同的研究。次要分析包括实验组和对照组使用不同药物或剂量的研究。无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间用于计算,并进行荟萃分析。亚组分析和meta 回归用于探索对照组中使用的药物方案以及临床病理变量对剂量密集治疗获益的影响。
主要分析包括 5 项研究,共纳入 9819 例患者,次要分析包括 6 项研究,共纳入 9679 例患者。剂量密集治疗显著改善了 DFS(HR 0.85,p<0.001)和 OS(HR 0.86,p=0.008)。次要分析也观察到了类似的结果。剂量密集方案主要在使用紫杉醇每 3 周作为对照组的研究中重要(DFS 的交互作用 p=0.04,OS 的交互作用 p=0.001)。在绝经前妇女和有淋巴结受累的患者中,观察到更大的相对获益幅度,但激素受体状态对结果没有影响。
辅助剂量密集方案可改善乳腺癌的结局。目前尚不确定观察到的获益是否反映了剂量密度的影响,还是紫杉醇每 3 周作为对照组的劣势。