Suppr超能文献

左束支传导阻滞患者与健康对照者的电机械不同步关系。

Relationships between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and healthy controls.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):1228-1239. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1204-0. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abnormal electrical activation may cause dyssynchronous left ventricular (LV) contraction. In this study, we characterized and analyzed electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patient with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and healthy controls.

METHODS

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) data from 994 patients were analyzed. Forty-three patient fulfilled criteria for LBBB and 24 for controls. Electrical activation was characterized with vector electrocardiography (VECG) and LV function including mechanical dyssynchrony with ECG-gated MPI phase analysis.

RESULTS

QRS duration (QRSd; r = 0.69, P < .001) and a few other VECG parameters correlated significantly with phase bandwidth (phaseBW) representing mechanical dyssynchrony. End-diastolic volume (EDV; r = 0.59, P < .001), ejection fraction and end-systolic volume correlated also with phaseBW. QRSd (β = 0.47, P < .001) and EDV (β = 0.36, P = .001) were independently associated with phaseBW explaining 55% of its variation. Sixty percent of patients with LBBB had significant mechanical dyssynchrony. Those patients had wider QRSd (159 vs 147 ms, P = .013) and larger EDV (144 vs 94 mL, P = .008) than those with synchronous LV contraction. Cut-off values for mechanical dyssynchrony seen in patients with LBBB were QRSd ≥ 165 ms and EDV ≥ 109 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite obvious conduction abnormality, LBBB is not always accompanied by mechanical dyssynchrony. QRSd and EDV explained 55% of variation seen in phaseBW. These two parameters were statistically different between LBBB cases with and without mechanical dyssynchrony.

摘要

背景

异常的电激活可能导致左心室(LV)收缩不同步。在这项研究中,我们对左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者和健康对照者的电机械不同步进行了特征描述和分析。

方法

对 994 例患者的心肌灌注成像(MPI)数据进行分析。43 例患者符合 LBBB 标准,24 例为对照组。用电向量心电图(VECG)描述电激活,用电图门控 MPI 相位分析描述 LV 功能,包括机械不同步。

结果

QRS 时限(QRSd;r=0.69,P<0.001)和少数其他 VECG 参数与代表机械不同步的相位带宽(phaseBW)显著相关。舒张末期容积(EDV;r=0.59,P<0.001)、射血分数和收缩末期容积也与 phaseBW 相关。QRSd(β=0.47,P<0.001)和 EDV(β=0.36,P=0.001)与 phaseBW 独立相关,可解释其变化的 55%。60%的 LBBB 患者存在明显的机械不同步。这些患者的 QRSd 较宽(159 比 147ms,P=0.013),EDV 较大(144 比 94mL,P=0.008),而 LV 收缩同步的患者则较小。LBBB 患者机械不同步的 cut-off 值为 QRSd≥165ms 和 EDV≥109mL。

结论

尽管存在明显的传导异常,但 LBBB 并不总是伴有机械不同步。QRSd 和 EDV 解释了 phaseBW 变化的 55%。LBBB 患者中,有和无机械不同步的这两个参数存在统计学差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验