Zhang Zhu-Ming, Rautaharju Pentti M, Prineas Ronald J, Whitsel Eric A, Tereshchenko Larisa, Soliman Elsayed Z
Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center (EPICARE), Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center (EPICARE), Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
J Electrocardiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;48(4):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 May 1.
Repolarization abnormality in bundle branch blocks (BBB) is traditionally ignored. This study evaluated the prognostic value of QRS/T angle for mortality in the presence and absence of BBB.
Total 15,408 participants (mean age 54 years, 55.2% women, 26.9% blacks, 2.8% with BBB) were from the Arteriosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Sex stratified Cox regression models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for coronary heart disease (CHD) and all-cause mortality for wide spatial QRS/T angle with and without BBB including right BBB (RBBB), left BBB (LBBB) and indetermined-type ventricular conduction defect (IVCD) and RBBB combined with left anterior fascicular block. During a median 22-year follow-up, 4767 deaths occurred, 728 of them CHD deaths. Using the No-BBB with QRS/T angle below median value as gender-specific reference groups, the mortality risk increase was significant for both women and men with No-BBB and QRS/T angle above the median value. In the pooled ICVD/LBBB group, the risk for CHD death was increased 15.9-fold in women and 6.04 fold in men, and for all-cause deaths 3.01-fold in women and 1.84-fold in men. However, the mortality risk in isolated RBBB group was only significantly increased in women but not in men.
A wide spatial QRS/T angle in BBB is associated with increased risk for CHD and all-cause mortality over and above the predictive value for BBB alone. The risk for women is as high as or higher than that in men.
传统上,束支传导阻滞(BBB)中的复极异常被忽视。本研究评估了QRS/T角在存在和不存在BBB情况下对死亡率的预后价值。
共有15408名参与者(平均年龄54岁,女性占55.2%,黑人占26.9%,2.8%患有BBB)来自社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究。采用性别分层的Cox回归模型计算宽空间QRS/T角在有和无BBB(包括右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)、左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)和不定型心室传导缺陷(IVCD)以及RBBB合并左前分支阻滞)情况下冠心病(CHD)和全因死亡率的风险比(HRs)及95%置信区间(CIs)。在中位22年的随访期间,发生了4767例死亡,其中728例为CHD死亡。以QRS/T角低于中位数的无BBB组作为性别特异性参照组,无BBB且QRS/T角高于中位数的女性和男性的死亡风险均显著增加。在合并的IVCD/LBBB组中,女性CHD死亡风险增加15.9倍,男性增加6.04倍;全因死亡女性增加3.01倍,男性增加1.84倍。然而,孤立RBBB组的死亡风险仅在女性中显著增加,在男性中未增加。
BBB中宽空间QRS/T角与CHD和全因死亡率增加相关,其风险超过单独BBB的预测价值。女性的风险与男性相当或更高。