Zhang Mei-Ren, Jiang Ji-Zhao
Department of Orthopaedics, Zhuhai Hospital of Guangdong Province Hospital of TCM, Zhuhai 519015, Guandong, China;
Department of Orthopaedics, Zhuhai Hospital of Guangdong Province Hospital of TCM, Zhuhai 519015, Guandong, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jul 25;30(7):638-642. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.011.
To investigate relation between displaced inferior ramus fractures and posterior pelvic ring injury.
From August 2012 to August 2015, 51 patients of pubic ramus fractures with complete record were retrospective reviewed including 27 males and 24 females with an average age of(49.1±19.0) years old ranging from 9 to 90 years old. The time from injury to treatment ranged from 0.3 to 48 hours with an average of 10.1 hours. According to Tile classification of pelvic fractures, 28 cases were type A, 17 cases were type B, 6 cases were type C. Pelvic radiographs and computed tomography scans were detailed and evaluated for whether there were posterior pelvic ring injury, meanwhile pubic rami fractures were divided into 4 groups as follow: displaced inferior ramus fractures group, undisplaced inferior ramus fractures group, displaced superior ramus fractures group, undisplaced superior ramus fractures group;the incidence rate of association of posterior pelvic ring injury was determined and compared.
Twenty-six patients had displaced inferior ramus fractures, all of them (100%) were combined with posterior pelvic ring injury. Twenty patients had undisplaced inferior ramus fractures, 6 of them(30%)were combined with posterior pelvic ring injury. Twenty-eight patients had displaced superior ramus fractures, 22 of them(78.5%) were combined with posterior pelvic ring injury. Twelve patients had displaced superior ramus fractures, 5 of them(41.6%) were combined with posterior pelvic ring injury. Compared with undisplaced inferior ramus fractures group, there was statistic difference(=0.028 8<0.05) on the incidence rate of posterior pelvic ring injury, there were no statistic difference(=0.055 8>0.05;=0.168 3>0.05) while compared with other undisplaced superior ramus fractures group and displaced superior ramus fractures group, but the incidence rate of association with posterior pelvic ring injury much higher than both of two groups (100% vs 41.6%, 78.5%).
Displaced inferior pubic ramus fractures have the highest incidence rate of association with posterior pelvic ring injury, frequently prompted injury to the posterior pelvis. Displaced inferior ramus fractures were an indirect evidence of posterior pelvic injury.
探讨耻骨下支移位骨折与骨盆后环损伤之间的关系。
回顾性分析2012年8月至2015年8月期间51例耻骨支骨折且记录完整的患者,其中男性27例,女性24例,平均年龄(49.1±19.0)岁,年龄范围为9至90岁。受伤至治疗时间为0.3至48小时,平均为10.1小时。根据骨盆骨折Tile分类,A型28例,B型17例,C型6例。详细分析骨盆X线片和计算机断层扫描结果,评估是否存在骨盆后环损伤,同时将耻骨支骨折分为4组:耻骨下支移位骨折组、耻骨下支无移位骨折组、耻骨上支移位骨折组、耻骨上支无移位骨折组;确定并比较骨盆后环损伤的发生率。
26例耻骨下支移位骨折患者均(100%)合并骨盆后环损伤。20例耻骨下支无移位骨折患者中,6例(30%)合并骨盆后环损伤。28例耻骨上支移位骨折患者中,22例(78.5%)合并骨盆后环损伤。12例耻骨上支无移位骨折患者中,5例(41.6%)合并骨盆后环损伤。与耻骨下支无移位骨折组相比,骨盆后环损伤发生率有统计学差异(=0.028 8<0.05),与耻骨上支无移位骨折组和耻骨上支移位骨折组相比无统计学差异(=0.055 8>0.05;=0.168 3>0.05),但其合并骨盆后环损伤的发生率远高于这两组(100% 对41.6%,78.5%)。
耻骨下支移位骨折合并骨盆后环损伤的发生率最高,常提示骨盆后部损伤。耻骨下支移位骨折是骨盆后部损伤的间接证据。