Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro, 43-gil, Songpa-gu Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro, 43-gil, Songpa-gu Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kangwon National University Hospital, Baengnyeong-ro 156, Chuncheon-Si Gangwon-Do, Republic of Korea.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Sep;106(5):849-853. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 May 1.
Posterior pelvic ring injury (PPRI) can be challenging to diagnose and visualize using plain radiographs; sometimes, PPRI is even overlooked. This study aimed to investigate differences between isolated pubic ramus fractures and fractures concomitant with PPRI in elderly patients.
Elderly patients with pubic ramus fractures and concomitant PPRI present different characteristics than patients with isolated ramus fractures.
We retrospectively reviewed data of 65 patients aged≥65 who visited the emergency department with a pubic ramus fracture on plain radiograph between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether PPRI was found by computed tomography (CT). We then compared patient data and fracture characteristics between the two groups, including displacement and location of the pubic ramus fracture and presence of complete anterior pelvic ring disruption (i.e., concurrent superior and inferior rami fracture).
PPRI was identified in 49 of 65 patients (75%) on CT. There was greater displacement of the pubic ramus fracture in patients with concomitant PPRI than in those with isolated pubic ramus fractures (4.6mm and 2.2mm, respectively, p<0.001). PPRI more commonly accompanied ramus fractures located medially to the obturator foramen than ramus fractures located in the obturator foramen or laterally to the obturator foramen (96%, 52%, and 77%, respectively, p=0.001). Complete anterior pelvic ring disruption was associated with significantly more concomitant PPRI relative to incomplete anterior pelvic ring disruption (84% and 22%, respectively, p<0.001).
When a pubic ramus fracture is markedly displaced, located medially to the obturator foramen and complete anterior pelvic ring disruption, care should be taken to assess PPRI.
IV, retrospective study.
骨盆后环损伤(PPRI)用普通 X 光片诊断和观察具有挑战性,有时甚至会被忽略。本研究旨在探讨老年患者耻骨支骨折伴发与不伴发 PPRI 之间的差异。
老年耻骨支骨折伴发 PPRI 的患者与单纯耻骨支骨折患者的特征不同。
我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间因耻骨支骨折在急诊就诊的 65 例年龄≥65 岁患者的资料。根据 CT 是否发现 PPRI 将患者分为两组。然后,我们比较了两组患者的资料和骨折特征,包括耻骨支骨折的移位和位置以及完全前骨盆环断裂(即同时存在耻骨上、下支骨折)的存在。
在 65 例患者中,49 例(75%)在 CT 上发现了 PPRI。伴发 PPRI 的耻骨支骨折的移位大于单纯耻骨支骨折(分别为 4.6mm 和 2.2mm,p<0.001)。PPRI 更常见于耻骨支骨折位于闭孔内肌孔内侧,而不是位于闭孔内肌孔或外侧(分别为 96%、52%和 77%,p=0.001)。完全前骨盆环断裂与不完全前骨盆环断裂相比,更常伴有伴发 PPRI(分别为 84%和 22%,p<0.001)。
当耻骨支骨折明显移位、位于闭孔内肌孔内侧且完全前骨盆环断裂时,应注意评估 PPRI。
IV,回顾性研究。