• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟预测新心血管药物在常规护理人群中的疗效和安全性。

Simulation for Predicting Effectiveness and Safety of New Cardiovascular Drugs in Routine Care Populations.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Nov;104(5):1008-1015. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1045. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.1045
PMID:29424437
Abstract

In the presence of heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE), the average treatment effect from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) may not be applicable to different patients, such as those in observational settings. Our objective was to develop a novel approach that uses individual-level simulation to expand RCT results to target patient populations in the presence of HTE. For this purpose, we compared the results of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial, and two observational studies that compared benefits and risks of dabigatran to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. We developed a simulation model that replicates the rates of ischemic stroke and major bleeding observed in RE-LY using published outcome risk models and participants' baseline characteristics. We used our validated simulation model to predict what the results of the RCT would have been had it been conducted in populations similar to those in the observational studies.

摘要

在存在治疗效果异质性(HTE)的情况下,随机对照试验(RCT)的平均治疗效果可能不适用于不同的患者,例如观察性环境中的患者。我们的目的是开发一种新方法,该方法使用个体水平模拟将 RCT 结果扩展到存在 HTE 的目标患者人群。为此,我们比较了随机评估长期抗凝治疗(RE-LY)试验的结果,以及两项观察性研究的结果,这些研究比较了达比加群酯与华法林在房颤患者中的获益和风险。我们开发了一个模拟模型,该模型使用已发表的结局风险模型和参与者的基线特征来复制 RE-LY 中观察到的缺血性卒中和大出血发生率。我们使用经过验证的模拟模型来预测如果在类似于观察性研究的人群中进行 RCT,其结果将会是什么。

相似文献

1
Simulation for Predicting Effectiveness and Safety of New Cardiovascular Drugs in Routine Care Populations.模拟预测新心血管药物在常规护理人群中的疗效和安全性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Nov;104(5):1008-1015. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1045. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
2
Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.达比加群与华法林用于真实世界临床实践中房颤治疗的系统评价与Meta分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Mar;9(2):126-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002369. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
3
Sequential Monitoring of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran in Routine Care.达比加群酯在常规治疗中的有效性和安全性的序贯监测
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005173.
4
Comparison of bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the RE-LY trial.房颤患者出血风险评分的比较:来自 RE-LY 试验的观察。
J Intern Med. 2018 Mar;283(3):282-292. doi: 10.1111/joim.12702. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
5
Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in 'real-world' patients with atrial fibrillation.达比加群与醋硝香豆素在“真实世界”房颤患者中的有效性和安全性比较
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1319-27. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv397. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Balancing the benefits and risks of 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation.比较达比加群酯与华法林在心房颤动中两剂的获益与风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 3;62(10):900-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
Individual Treatment Effect Estimation of 2 Doses of Dabigatran on Stroke and Major Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群酯两种剂量对房颤卒中和大出血的个体治疗效果评估。
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):2846-2856. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035266. Epub 2019 May 3.
8
Risks for stroke, bleeding, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dabigatran or warfarin in relation to the CHADS2 score: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.在接受达比加群或华法林治疗的房颤患者中,与 CHADS2 评分相关的卒中和出血风险及死亡率:RE-LY 试验的亚组分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):660-7, W204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00004.
9
A comparison of the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in a large healthcare system.在大型医疗体系中比较达比加群酯和华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的安全性和有效性。
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov 25;114(6):1290-8. doi: 10.1160/TH15-06-0453. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
10
Outcomes of Dabigatran and Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation in Contemporary Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study.达比加群酯和华法林在当代实践中用于房颤的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Dec 19;167(12):845-854. doi: 10.7326/M16-1157. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational modeling: What does it tell us about atrial fibrillation therapy?计算模型:它能告诉我们关于房颤治疗的什么信息?
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 15;287:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.077. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
2
Using Real-World Data to Extrapolate Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials.利用真实世界数据从随机对照试验中推断证据。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 May;105(5):1156-1163. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1210. Epub 2018 Sep 24.