• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达比加群酯在常规治疗中的有效性和安全性的序贯监测

Sequential Monitoring of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran in Routine Care.

作者信息

Schneeweiss Sebastian, Gopalakrishnan Chandrasekar, Bartels Dorothee B, Franklin Jessica M, Zint Kristina, Kulldorff Martin, Huybrechts Krista F

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.S., C.G., J.M.F., M.K., K.F.H.).

Global Epidemiology, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany (D.B.B., K.Z.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005173.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005173
PMID:30764655
Abstract

Background The increasing availability of electronic healthcare data enables ongoing monitoring of the effectiveness and safety of newly marketed medications. We sought to demonstrate a 5-year prospective monitoring system of dabigatran for stroke prevention that may expedite discovery and allow ongoing evidence development. Methods and Results Between 2011 and 2015, we conducted 9 sequential analyses of dabigatran versus warfarin users in a sequential cohort design in 2 US claims databases. Analyses 4 through 9 were prespecified, and analyses 1 through 3 were added subsequently using the same methodology. New users of anticoagulants with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were followed until a study outcome of hospitalization for stroke (hemorrhagic and ischemic) or hospitalization for major hemorrhage (intracranial and extracranial). Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated after 1:1 propensity score matching. Sequential analyses 1 through 3 on stroke prevention using data through June 2012 were limited by few events leading to wide CIs. As data accumulated the effect estimate in analysis 4 visually stabilized at a 25% risk reduction with increasingly narrower CIs (-46% to +9% in December 2012 and -42% to -2% in September 2015). Improved data-adaptive confounding adjustment with high-dimensional propensity score reached a stable state already at analysis 3 and was slightly closer to the randomized clinical trial finding (-39%). The risk of major hemorrhage was 28% lower in dabigatran initiators (-35% to -20%) a finding that was stable throughout analyses 2 to 9. Conclusions Prospectively monitoring the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran for stroke prevention allowed for early insights with increasing precision over time.

摘要

背景 电子医疗数据的可得性不断提高,使得对新上市药物的有效性和安全性进行持续监测成为可能。我们试图建立一个为期5年的达比加群预防卒中的前瞻性监测系统,该系统可能会加快发现速度并促进证据的持续积累。方法与结果 在2011年至2015年期间,我们在美国的2个索赔数据库中采用序贯队列设计对达比加群使用者与华法林使用者进行了9次序贯分析。分析4至9是预先设定的,分析1至3随后采用相同方法添加。对非瓣膜性心房颤动的抗凝剂新使用者进行随访,直至出现卒中住院(出血性和缺血性)或大出血住院(颅内和颅外)的研究结局。在1:1倾向评分匹配后估计风险比和95%可信区间。使用截至2012年6月的数据进行的关于预防卒中的序贯分析1至3因事件较少导致可信区间较宽而受到限制。随着数据的积累,分析4中的效应估计在视觉上稳定在降低25%的风险,可信区间越来越窄(2012年12月为-46%至+9%,2015年9月为-42%至-2%)。采用高维倾向评分的改进的数据适应性混杂调整在分析3时已达到稳定状态,且略接近随机临床试验结果(-39%)。达比加群起始使用者的大出血风险降低了28%(-35%至-20%),这一发现在分析2至9中保持稳定。结论 对达比加群预防卒中的有效性和安全性进行前瞻性监测,随着时间的推移能更精确地提供早期见解。

相似文献

1
Sequential Monitoring of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran in Routine Care.达比加群酯在常规治疗中的有效性和安全性的序贯监测
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005173.
2
Comparison of the short-term risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients newly treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: a French nationwide propensity-matched cohort study.达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素K拮抗剂新治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者出血和动脉血栓栓塞事件短期风险的比较:一项法国全国性倾向匹配队列研究。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 29;132(13):1252-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015710. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.达比加群与华法林用于真实世界临床实践中房颤治疗的系统评价与Meta分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Mar;9(2):126-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002369. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
4
A comparison of the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in a large healthcare system.在大型医疗体系中比较达比加群酯和华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的安全性和有效性。
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov 25;114(6):1290-8. doi: 10.1160/TH15-06-0453. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
5
Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in 'real-world' patients with atrial fibrillation.达比加群与醋硝香豆素在“真实世界”房颤患者中的有效性和安全性比较
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1319-27. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv397. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Higher persistence in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran versus warfarin.与华法林相比,达比加群治疗新诊断的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的持续性更高。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):567-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000192. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
7
Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in routine care of patients with atrial fibrillation.达比加群酯和华法林在心房颤动患者常规治疗中的安全性和有效性。
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov 25;114(6):1277-89. doi: 10.1160/TH15-06-0497. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.非瓣膜性心房颤动且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中应用阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2142-2149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
9
Propensity Score Weighting Compared to Matching in a Study of Dabigatran and Warfarin.在达比加群与华法林的一项研究中,倾向评分加权与匹配的比较
Drug Saf. 2017 Feb;40(2):169-181. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0480-3.
10
Sex Differences in Dabigatran Use, Safety, And Effectiveness In a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.在一个基于人群的房颤患者队列中达比加群使用、安全性及有效性方面的性别差异
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Nov;8(6):593-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001398. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential Epidemiological Analyses of Real-World Data: A Tool for Prospective Drug Safety Surveillance from the Rofecoxib Example.真实世界数据的序贯流行病学分析:以罗非昔布为例的前瞻性药物安全性监测工具
Drug Saf. 2025 May;48(5):489-502. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01512-7. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
A Scalable Approach to Assess the Safety of Recently Marketed Systemic Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: First Analysis Cycle of a Sequential Monitoring System.一种在临床实践中评估近期上市的特应性皮炎全身治疗安全性的可扩展方法:序贯监测系统的首个分析周期
J Invest Dermatol. 2025 May;145(5):1070-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2024.08.034. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Assessing the Benefits and Harms of Pharmacotherapy in Older Adults with Frailty: Insights from Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies of Routine Health Care Data.
评估衰弱老年人药物治疗的获益和危害:来自常规医疗保健数据的药物流行病学研究的启示。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Jul;41(7):583-600. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01121-0. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Durability of the Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine in the Prevention of COVID-19 Infections and Hospitalizations in the US Before and During the Delta Variant Surge.单剂量Ad26.COV2.S疫苗在美国德尔塔变种激增之前及期间预防新冠病毒感染和住院的持久性
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222959. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2959.
5
Key Characteristics of Database Studies on Drug Effectiveness in the Postmarketing Stage: A Systematic Review.药品上市后阶段药物有效性的数据库研究的主要特征:系统评价。
Pharmaceut Med. 2021 Nov;35(6):327-338. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00406-8. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Surveillance of Antidepressant Safety (SADS): Active Signal Detection of Serious Medical Events Following SSRI and SNRI Initiation Using Big Healthcare Data.使用大健康医疗数据对 SSRI 和 SNRIs 起始使用后的严重医疗事件进行主动信号检测:抗抑郁药安全性监测(SADS)。
Drug Saf. 2021 Nov;44(11):1215-1230. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01110-x. Epub 2021 Sep 8.