• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化血压控制对 2 型糖尿病患者 9 年随访的影响:高危 ACCORDION 试验参与者的亚组分析。

Effect of intensive blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 9 years of follow-up: A subgroup analysis of high-risk ACCORDION trial participants.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusettes.

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jun;20(6):1499-1502. doi: 10.1111/dom.13248. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1111/dom.13248
PMID:29424469
Abstract

Although guidelines recommend strict blood pressure (BP) control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and elevated cardiovascular risk, the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. We investigated the effect of intensive BP control on clinical outcomes in patients with T2DM over 9 years of follow-up. We included Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes - Blood Pressure participants in the standard glucose control arm who had established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, were ≥75 years of age or who had a 10-year coronary heart risk ≥15%. Participants were randomized to either intensive (systolic BP < 120 mm Hg) or standard (systolic BP < 140 mm Hg) BP control for an average of 5 years. Observational follow-up occurred for an average of 4 years thereafter. After an average total follow-up of 9 years, intensive BP control reduced the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke by 25% (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.95; P = .02). The overall benefit was driven by a reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (P = .01). In this post-hoc analysis, the benefits of a fixed-duration intensive BP control intervention in patients with T2DM persisted throughout 9 years of follow-up.

摘要

尽管指南建议 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)和心血管风险升高的患者严格控制血压(BP),但这种方法的长期效果尚不清楚。我们研究了强化 BP 控制对 9 年随访期间 T2DM 患者临床结局的影响。我们纳入了心血管风险控制行动-糖尿病-血压研究中标准血糖控制组的患者,他们患有已确诊的心血管疾病、慢性肾脏病、年龄≥75 岁或 10 年冠心病风险≥15%。参与者被随机分配到强化(收缩压<120mmHg)或标准(收缩压<140mmHg)BP 控制组,平均随访 5 年。此后平均进行了 4 年的观察性随访。在平均 9 年的总随访后,强化 BP 控制使心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性卒中的复合终点降低了 25%(风险比,0.75;95%置信区间,0.60-0.95;P=0.02)。整体获益主要归因于非致死性心肌梗死的减少(P=0.01)。在这项事后分析中,T2DM 患者固定时长的强化 BP 控制干预的获益在 9 年的随访期间持续存在。

相似文献

1
Effect of intensive blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 9 years of follow-up: A subgroup analysis of high-risk ACCORDION trial participants.强化血压控制对 2 型糖尿病患者 9 年随访的影响:高危 ACCORDION 试验参与者的亚组分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jun;20(6):1499-1502. doi: 10.1111/dom.13248. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
2
Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control in SPRINT-Eligible Participants of ACCORD-BP.SPRINT 试验符合条件的 ACCORD-BP 参与者强化与标准血压控制的比较。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1733-1738. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1366. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
3
Orthostatic Hypotension in the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) Blood Pressure Trial: Prevalence, Incidence, and Prognostic Significance.糖尿病心血管风险控制行动(ACCORD)血压试验中的直立性低血压:患病率、发病率及预后意义
Hypertension. 2016 Oct;68(4):888-95. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07474. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients With and Patients Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis From Two Randomized Trials.伴有和不伴有 2 型糖尿病的患者强化降压治疗:两项随机试验的汇总分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1142-1148. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1722. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
6
Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Standard but Not Intensive Glycemic Control.强化降压治疗对接受标准而非强化血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者的益处。
Hypertension. 2018 Aug;72(2):323-330. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11408. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group.基于利尿剂的降压治疗对老年单纯收缩期高血压糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险的影响。老年收缩期高血压计划合作研究组。
JAMA. 1996 Dec 18;276(23):1886-92.
8
Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study.收缩压与2型糖尿病大血管及微血管并发症的关联(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究36):前瞻性观察研究
BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):412-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.412.
9
Association between difference in blood pressure reduction and risk of cardiovascular events in a type 2 diabetes population: A meta-regression analysis.2 型糖尿病患者血压降低程度差异与心血管事件风险的关系:一项荟萃回归分析。
Diabetes Metab. 2019 Dec;45(6):550-556. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Influence of metabolic syndrome and race on the relationship between intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in the SPRINT cohort.代谢综合征和种族对 SPRINT 队列中强化血压控制与心血管结局关系的影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):629-637. doi: 10.1111/dom.13127. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetic Vasculopathy: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Insights.糖尿病血管病变:分子机制与临床新见
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 9;25(2):804. doi: 10.3390/ijms25020804.
2
Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone (CS-3150) in primary hypertension: a meta-analysis.依普利酮(CS-3150)在原发性高血压中的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Hum Hypertens. 2024 Feb;38(2):102-109. doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00889-9. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3
Cardiorenal diseases in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical trials and real-world practice.2 型糖尿病的心脏肾脏疾病:临床试验与真实世界实践。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023 Mar;19(3):151-163. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00776-2. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
4
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.美国临床内分泌学会临床实践指南:制定糖尿病综合护理计划-2022 更新版。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Oct;28(10):923-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japanese People With Normal Glycemic Level: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.甘油三酯-血糖-体重指数与血糖正常的日本人 2 型糖尿病发病风险:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 14;13:907973. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.907973. eCollection 2022.
6
Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes-The Novel Treatment Possibilities.高血压与 2 型糖尿病——新颖的治疗可能性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 10;23(12):6500. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126500.
7
The Health Economics of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive and Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Literature Review with Application to the Canadian Context.转移性激素敏感和非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的卫生经济学:系统文献回顾及其在加拿大背景下的应用。
Curr Oncol. 2022 May 7;29(5):3393-3424. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050275.
8
Correlation between the Variability of Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Cardiovascular Risk in New-Onset T2DM Patients.初诊 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白变异性与心血管风险的相关性。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Mar 11;2022:5370301. doi: 10.1155/2022/5370301. eCollection 2022.
9
Group Medical Visit and Microfinance Intervention for Patients With Diabetes or Hypertension in Kenya.肯尼亚的群组医疗访视和小额信贷干预对糖尿病或高血压患者的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 27;77(16):2007-2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.002.
10
Pay-for-performance programmes reduce stroke risks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a national cohort study.按绩效付费计划可降低2型糖尿病患者的中风风险:一项全国队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 16;9(10):e026626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026626.