• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化降压治疗对接受标准而非强化血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者的益处。

Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Standard but Not Intensive Glycemic Control.

机构信息

From the Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Center Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2018 Aug;72(2):323-330. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11408. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11408
PMID:29967045
Abstract

This study aimed to assess whether intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment has benefits in preventing cardiovascular events, including heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Using the ACCORD BP trial (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure) data, hazard ratios for cardiovascular events with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard models to compare the time to the first cardiovascular event in patients receiving standard (n=2362) or intensive glycemic control (n=2371). The overall mean follow-up period was 4.5 years, and cardiovascular events were confirmed in 528 patients. The cardiovascular event risk in patients receiving standard glycemic control was significantly lower in the intensive BP treatment group than in the standard BP treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.90; =0.005), whereas that in patients receiving intensive glycemic control did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.36; =0.61). There was a significant interaction between the BP treatment strategy and glycemic control (=0.02). The stroke risk in patients receiving standard glycemic control was significantly lower in the intensive BP treatment group, but not in patients receiving intensive glycemic control. Although not significant, all-cause mortality in patients receiving intensive glycemic control was higher in patients receiving intensive BP treatment than in those receiving standard BP treatment (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.92; =0.05). Benefits of intensive BP treatment were observed only in ACCORD BP participants receiving standard glycemic control without additional risk factors.

摘要

本研究旨在评估强化血压(BP)治疗是否有益于预防心血管事件,包括 2 型糖尿病患者的心力衰竭。使用 ACCORD BP 试验(控制心血管风险中的行动糖尿病血压)数据,使用 Cox 比例风险模型计算心血管事件的风险比及其 95%置信区间,以比较接受标准(n=2362)或强化血糖控制(n=2371)的患者发生首次心血管事件的时间。总的平均随访期为 4.5 年,有 528 例患者发生心血管事件。接受标准血糖控制的患者在强化 BP 治疗组的心血管事件风险明显低于标准 BP 治疗组(风险比,0.71;95%置信区间,0.56-0.90;=0.005),而接受强化血糖控制的患者在两组之间无显著差异(风险比,1.06;95%置信区间,0.83-1.36;=0.61)。BP 治疗策略和血糖控制之间存在显著交互作用(=0.02)。接受标准血糖控制的患者在强化 BP 治疗组的中风风险明显降低,但在接受强化血糖控制的患者中则没有。尽管不显著,但接受强化血糖控制的患者的全因死亡率在接受强化 BP 治疗的患者中高于接受标准 BP 治疗的患者(风险比,1.38;95%置信区间,0.99-1.92;=0.05)。强化 BP 治疗的益处仅见于接受标准血糖控制且无其他危险因素的 ACCORD BP 参与者中。

相似文献

1
Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Standard but Not Intensive Glycemic Control.强化降压治疗对接受标准而非强化血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者的益处。
Hypertension. 2018 Aug;72(2):323-330. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11408. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Standard Glycemic Control and in Those Without Diabetes Mellitus: Reconciling Results From ACCORD BP and SPRINT.强化收缩压降压治疗对标准血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者及无糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡率的影响:来自 ACCORD BP 和 SPRINT 的结果再分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009326. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009326.
3
Heterogeneous Effects of Intensive Glycemic and Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Events Among Diabetes by Living Arrangements.基于居住安排的糖尿病患者强化血糖和血压控制对心血管事件的异质性影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e033860. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033860. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control in SPRINT-Eligible Participants of ACCORD-BP.SPRINT 试验符合条件的 ACCORD-BP 参与者强化与标准血压控制的比较。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1733-1738. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1366. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
5
The Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.基础舒张压对强化降压对 2 型糖尿病心血管结局和全因死亡率影响的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1878-1884. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2047. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Orthostatic Hypotension in the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) Blood Pressure Trial: Prevalence, Incidence, and Prognostic Significance.糖尿病心血管风险控制行动(ACCORD)血压试验中的直立性低血压:患病率、发病率及预后意义
Hypertension. 2016 Oct;68(4):888-95. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07474. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
7
Intensive Glycemic Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on β-Blockers.β受体阻滞剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的强化血糖治疗。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Oct;39(10):1818-26. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0721. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Long-Term Effects of Intensive Glycemic and Blood Pressure Control and Fenofibrate Use on Kidney Outcomes.强化血糖和血压控制及使用非诺贝特对肾脏结局的长期影响。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):1693-1702. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06200518. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients With and Patients Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis From Two Randomized Trials.伴有和不伴有 2 型糖尿病的患者强化降压治疗:两项随机试验的汇总分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1142-1148. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1722. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Thiazide Use and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Well-Controlled Blood Pressure.噻嗪类利尿剂的使用与血压控制良好的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管事件。
Hypertension. 2019 Dec;74(6):1541-1550. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13886. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Diabetic Kidney Disease and beyond.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在糖尿病肾病及其他疾病中的应用
Glomerular Dis. 2025 Jan 23;5(1):119-132. doi: 10.1159/000543685. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.美国临床内分泌学会临床实践指南:制定糖尿病综合护理计划-2022 更新版。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Oct;28(10):923-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
Blood Pressure Monitoring as a Digital Health Tool for Improving Diabetes Clinical Outcomes: Retrospective Real-world Study.
血压监测作为改善糖尿病临床结局的数字健康工具:回顾性真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 8;24(2):e32923. doi: 10.2196/32923.
4
Intensive versus standard blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes: a restricted mean survival time analysis of a randomised controlled trial.强化与标准血压控制对 2 型糖尿病的影响:一项随机对照试验的限制平均生存时间分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 13;11(9):e050335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050335.
5
Hypertension in diabetes care: emerging roles of recent hypoglycemic agents.糖尿病治疗中的高血压:新型降糖药物的新作用。
Hypertens Res. 2021 Aug;44(8):897-905. doi: 10.1038/s41440-021-00665-7. Epub 2021 May 14.
6
Consensus Recommendations by the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology: Optimising Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.亚太心脏病学会共识推荐:优化2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Apr 19;16:e14. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.52. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Recent advances in managing primary hypertension.原发性高血压管理的最新进展
Fac Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9:4. doi: 10.12703/b/9-4. eCollection 2020.
8
[São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020Chamado à ação de São Paulo para prevenção e controle da hipertensão arterial: 2020].[圣保罗高血压预防与控制行动呼吁:2020年 圣保罗高血压预防与控制行动呼吁:2020年]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 26;45:e26. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.26. eCollection 2021.
9
[São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020Llamado a la acción de San Pablo para la prevención y el control de la hipertensión arterial, 2020].[圣保罗高血压预防与控制行动呼吁:2020年 圣保罗高血压预防与控制行动呼吁,2020年]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 26;44:e27. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.27. eCollection 2021.
10
On the need of the simultaneous control of arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus.论同时控制动脉高血压和糖尿病的必要性。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Feb;22(2):221-222. doi: 10.1111/jch.13794. Epub 2020 Jan 15.