• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Treatment of mild to moderate pain of acute soft tissue injury: diflunisal vs acetaminophen with codeine.

作者信息

Muncie H L, King D E, DeForge B

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1986 Aug;23(2):125-7.

PMID:2942630
Abstract

Acute soft tissue injuries create pain and limitation of function. Treatment requires analgesia and time for full recovery. Acetaminophen with codeine (650 mg plus 60 mg, respectively, every 4 to 6 hours) is used frequently as the analgesic of choice. Diflunisal (1,000 mg initially then 500 mg twice a day) vs acetaminophen with codeine was prospectively studied in the treatment of acute mild to moderate pain from soft tissue injuries. Thirty-five patients with acute strains, sprains, or low back pain were randomized to treatment (17 acetaminophen with codeine vs 18 diflunisal). Both groups were similar in the amount of pain and type of injury at initiation of therapy. Patient pain rating went from 3.3 +/- 0.6 to 1.6 +/- 1.5 for acetaminophen with codeine and from 3.3 +/- 0.6 to 1.3 +/- 1.1 for diflunisal. However, 65 percent of acetaminophen with codeine patients experienced side effects, with 35 percent of these patients stopping the medication because of intolerable side effects. In the diflunisal group, 28 percent of the patients experienced side effects and 5 percent had to stop the medication early. Diflunisal was found to be an effective analgesic in mild to moderate pain of acute soft tissue injuries, and caused fewer and more tolerable side effects than did acetaminophen with codeine.

摘要

相似文献

1
Treatment of mild to moderate pain of acute soft tissue injury: diflunisal vs acetaminophen with codeine.
J Fam Pract. 1986 Aug;23(2):125-7.
2
Comparison of diflunisal and acetaminophen with codeine in the treatment of initial or recurrent acute low back strain.双氟尼酸与对乙酰氨基酚加可待因治疗初次或复发性急性下背部扭伤的比较。
Clin Ther. 1986;9 Suppl C:52-8.
3
Comparison of diflunisal and acetaminophen with codeine in the treatment of mild to moderate pain due to strains and sprains.
Clin Ther. 1986;8(3):269-74.
4
Comparison of diflunisal and acetaminophen with codeine in the management of grade 2 ankle sprain.双氟尼酸与对乙酰氨基酚联合可待因治疗2级踝关节扭伤的比较。
Clin Ther. 1986;8(5):520-6.
5
A 12-hour evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diflunisal, acetaminophen, and acetaminophen-codeine combination, and placebo in postoperative pain.双氟尼酸、对乙酰氨基酚、对乙酰氨基酚-可待因组合及安慰剂对术后疼痛镇痛效果的12小时评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 1983 Mar-Apr;3(2 Pt 2):47S-54S.
6
Efficacy of diflunisal versus acetaminophen with codeine in controlling mild to moderate pain after arthroscopy.双氟尼酸与对乙酰氨基酚加可待因在控制关节镜检查后轻至中度疼痛方面的疗效比较。
Clin Ther. 1986;8(2):164-9.
7
Comparison of diflunisal and naproxen in the management of acute low back strain.
Clin Ther. 1986;9 Suppl C:47-51.
8
Comparison of diflunisal and an aspirin-codeine combination in the management of patients having one-visit endodontic therapy.双氟尼酸与阿司匹林-可待因组合用于单次就诊根管治疗患者的疗效比较
Clin Ther. 1987;9(5):500-11.
9
A method for the 12-hour evaluation of analgesic efficacy in outpatients with postoperative oral surgery pain. Three studies of diflunisal.
Pharmacotherapy. 1983 Mar-Apr;3(2 Pt 2):23S-37S.
10
Diflunisal in the treatment of low back pain in a multicentre study.双氟尼酸治疗腰痛的多中心研究
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1986;6(1):53-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus other oral analgesic agents for acute soft tissue injury.口服非甾体抗炎药与其他口服镇痛药治疗急性软组织损伤的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 12;8(8):CD007789. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007789.pub3.