Upper Limb Reconstructive and Microsurgery Unit, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research & Learning (NOCERAL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Upper Limb Reconstructive and Microsurgery Unit, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research & Learning (NOCERAL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Hand Ther. 2019 Oct-Dec;32(4):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
Prospective randomized study.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has been described as the most common compression neuropathy. Many modalities exist for conservative treatment. Efficacy of each modality has been described in the literature. However, the effectiveness of combination of these modalities is not well established. The purpose of this study is to assess the short-term clinical outcome of conservative treatment for CTS comparing orthosis alone with combination of orthosis, nerve/tendon gliding exercises, and ultrasound therapy.
Forty-one patients who presented to Upper Limb Reconstructive and Microsurgery Clinic, University Malaya Medical Centre with CTS and positive electrodiagnostic study were recruited. Fifteen patients had bilateral CTS. Fifty-six wrists were equally randomized to orthosis alone and a combined therapy of orthosis, nerve/tendon gliding exercise, and ultrasound therapy. All patients were required to complete the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire during the first visit and 2 months after treatment.
Both the orthosis and combined therapy groups showed a significant improvement in symptoms and function after treatment. The mean difference of symptoms in the orthosis group was 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.83 (P = .001) and in the combined therapy group was 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24-0.72 (P < .001). Mean difference of function in the orthosis group was 0.59; 95% CI: 0.28-0.91 (P = .001) and combined group was 0.69; 95% CI: 0.49-0.89 (P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in symptom severity and functional status scores between the groups.
Our findings support other findings where orthosis and exercises improved symptom severity and functional status scores, however, there was no significant difference between orthosis alone and combined treatment.
Patients who underwent conservative management for CTS showed improvement in symptoms and function. However, the combination of orthosis, nerve/tendon gliding exercises, and ultrasound therapy did not offer additional benefit compared to orthosis alone.
前瞻性随机研究。
腕管综合征(CTS)已被描述为最常见的压迫性神经病。有许多方法可用于保守治疗。每种方法的疗效都在文献中有描述。然而,这些方法联合应用的效果尚未得到很好的确立。本研究的目的是评估单独使用矫形器与矫形器、神经/肌腱滑动练习和超声治疗相结合治疗 CTS 的短期临床效果。
41 名患有 CTS 并经电诊断研究阳性的患者被招募至马来亚大学医学中心上肢重建与显微外科诊所。15 名患者患有双侧 CTS。56 个手腕被平均随机分配到矫形器单独治疗组和矫形器、神经/肌腱滑动练习和超声治疗联合治疗组。所有患者均需在首次就诊时和治疗后 2 个月完成波士顿腕管问卷。
矫形器组和联合治疗组在治疗后症状和功能均有显著改善。矫形器组的症状平均差异为 0.53;95%置信区间[CI]:0.23-0.83(P=0.001),联合治疗组为 0.48;95%CI:0.24-0.72(P<0.001)。矫形器组的功能平均差异为 0.59;95%CI:0.28-0.91(P=0.001),联合组为 0.69;95%CI:0.49-0.89(P<0.001)。然而,两组间症状严重程度和功能状态评分无显著差异。
我们的发现支持其他发现,即矫形器和运动可改善症状严重程度和功能状态评分,但单独使用矫形器与联合治疗之间无显著差异。
接受 CTS 保守治疗的患者症状和功能均有改善。然而,与单独使用矫形器相比,矫形器、神经/肌腱滑动练习和超声治疗的联合应用并没有提供额外的益处。