Calamia Matthew, Hill Benjamin D, Musso Mandi W, Pella Russell D, Gouvier Wm Drew
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2018 Sep;10(3):177-188. doi: 10.1007/s12402-018-0251-3. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
The objective of this study was to assess the factor structure and clinical correlates of a 61-item version of the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS), a self-report retrospective measure of childhood problems, experiences, and behavior used in ADHD assessment. Given the currently mostly widely used form of the WURS was derived via a criterion-keyed approach, the study aimed to use latent variable modeling of the 61-item WURS to potentially identify more and more homogeneous set of items reflecting current conceptualizations of ADHD symptoms. Exploratory structural equation modeling was used to generate factor scores which were then correlated with neuropsychological measures of intelligence and executive attention as well as a broad measure of personality and emotional functioning. Support for a modified five-factor model was found: ADHD, disruptive mood and behavior, negative affectivity, social confidence, and academic problems. The ADHD factor differed somewhat from the traditional 25-item WURS short form largely through weaker associations with several measures of personality and psychopathology. This study identified a factor more aligned with DSM-5 conceptualization of ADHD as well as measures of other types of childhood characteristics and symptoms which may prove useful for both research and clinical practice.
本研究的目的是评估温德尔犹他评定量表(WURS)61项版本的因子结构和临床相关性,该量表是一种用于多动症评估的自我报告式回顾性测量工具,用于评估童年问题、经历和行为。鉴于目前使用最广泛的WURS版本是通过效标关联法得出的,本研究旨在对61项WURS进行潜在变量建模,以识别出越来越多反映多动症症状当前概念化的同类项目集。探索性结构方程模型用于生成因子得分,然后将其与智力和执行注意力的神经心理学测量指标以及人格和情绪功能的综合测量指标进行相关性分析。研究发现支持一种修正的五因素模型:多动症、破坏性行为和情绪、消极情感性、社交信心和学业问题。多动症因子与传统的25项WURS简表有所不同,主要体现在与几种人格和精神病理学测量指标的关联较弱。本研究确定了一个与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中多动症概念化更一致的因子,以及其他类型童年特征和症状的测量指标,这可能对研究和临床实践都有用。