• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SLC22A1 和 CYP3A5 基因型对慢性髓性白血病伊马替尼反应的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Impact of SLC22A1 and CYP3A5 genotypes on imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Interdepartmental Research Center of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics (CRIFF), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.

Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res. 2018 May;131:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2018.02.005
PMID:29427770
Abstract

Contrasting results have been reported on the role of rs628031 and rs683369 polymorphisms of SLC22A1 and rs776746 of CYP3A5 on imatinib treatment response in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In the present study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to estimate the impact of the above-mentioned gene variants on major molecular response (MMR) or complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in imatinib-treated CML patients. We performed a comprehensive search through PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane databases up to September 2017. The pooled analyses showed association between carriers of SLC22A1 rs628031A allele (GA + AA vs GG, OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88, P = 0.011) or rs683369G allele (CG + GG vs CC, OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.96, P = 0.032) and a lower MMR rate. The combined analyses also revealed a correlation between the dominant (GG + AG vs AA, OR: 2.43, 95%CI: 1.12-5.27, P = 0.024) or the allelic model (G vs A, OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.09-2.72, P = 0.020) of CYP3A5 rs776746 with higher CCyR rates. The subsequent sensitivity analysis confirmed the statistical significance of CYP3A5 rs776746 among Asian CML patients (dominant model OR: 3.90; 95%CI: 2.47-6.14, P < 0.001; allelic model OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.47-2.95, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis supports the association of SLC22A1 and CYP3A5 genotypes with clinical imatinib response rates of CML patients, nevertheless further large studies, particularly in Caucasians, are still warranted to provide conclusive evidences.

摘要

SLC22A1 的 rs628031 和 rs683369 多态性以及 CYP3A5 的 rs776746 多态性对慢性髓性白血病 (CML) 患者伊马替尼治疗反应的作用已有报道,但结果不尽相同。本研究通过系统评价和荟萃分析,对上述基因变异与伊马替尼治疗的 CML 患者主要分子反应 (MMR) 或完全细胞遗传学反应 (CCyR) 的相关性进行评估。我们通过 PubMed、Web of Knowledge 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了全面检索,检索截止日期为 2017 年 9 月。汇总分析显示,SLC22A1 rs628031A 等位基因(GA+AA 与 GG,OR:0.58,95%CI:0.38-0.88,P=0.011)或 rs683369G 等位基因(CG+GG 与 CC,OR:0.64,95%CI:0.42-0.96,P=0.032)携带者的 MMR 率较低。合并分析还显示,CYP3A5 rs776746 显性(GG+AG 与 AA,OR:2.43,95%CI:1.12-5.27,P=0.024)或等位基因模型(G 与 A,OR:1.72,95%CI:1.09-2.72,P=0.020)与较高的 CCyR 率相关。随后的敏感性分析证实了 CYP3A5 rs776746 在亚洲 CML 患者中的统计学意义(显性模型 OR:3.90;95%CI:2.47-6.14,P<0.001;等位基因模型 OR:2.08;95%CI:1.47-2.95,P<0.001)。总之,本荟萃分析支持 SLC22A1 和 CYP3A5 基因型与 CML 患者伊马替尼临床反应率之间的相关性,但仍需要进一步的大型研究,特别是在白种人中,以提供确凿的证据。

相似文献

1
Impact of SLC22A1 and CYP3A5 genotypes on imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.SLC22A1 和 CYP3A5 基因型对慢性髓性白血病伊马替尼反应的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacol Res. 2018 May;131:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
OCT1 genetic variants are associated with long term outcomes in imatinib treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients.OCT1基因变异与伊马替尼治疗的慢性髓性白血病患者的长期预后相关。
Eur J Haematol. 2014 Apr;92(4):283-8. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12235. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
3
Influence of MDR1 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on trough levels and therapeutic response of imatinib in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.MDR1和CYP3A5基因多态性对新诊断慢性髓性白血病患者伊马替尼谷浓度及治疗反应的影响。
Pharmacol Res. 2017 Jun;120:138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 19.
4
Influence of genetic polymorphisms on imatinib concentration and therapeutic response in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.遗传多态性对慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者伊马替尼浓度和治疗反应的影响。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 May 30;133:112090. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112090. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
Genetic variations of hOCT1 gene and CYP3A4/A5 genes and their association with imatinib response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.hOCT1基因和CYP3A4/A5基因的遗传变异及其与慢性髓性白血病中伊马替尼反应的关联。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2015 Oct 15;765:124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.08.034. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
6
SLC22A1-ABCB1 haplotype profiles predict imatinib pharmacokinetics in Asian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.SLC22A1-ABCB1 单倍型谱预测亚洲慢性髓性白血病患者伊马替尼的药代动力学。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051771. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
7
Do SLCO1B3 (T334G) and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms affect response in Egyptian chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving imatinib therapy?SLCO1B3(T334G)和CYP3A5*3基因多态性是否会影响接受伊马替尼治疗的埃及慢性髓性白血病患者的反应?
Hematology. 2013 Jul;18(4):211-6. doi: 10.1179/1607845412Y.0000000067. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
8
Clinical relevance of a pharmacogenetic approach using multiple candidate genes to predict response and resistance to imatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia.采用多个候选基因的药物遗传学方法预测慢性髓性白血病对伊马替尼治疗的反应和耐药性的临床相关性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 15;15(14):4750-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0145. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
9
Trough concentration and ABCG2 polymorphism are better to predict imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.谷浓度和ABCG2基因多态性能更好地预测慢性髓性白血病对伊马替尼的反应:一项荟萃分析。
Pharmacogenomics. 2017 Jan;18(1):35-56. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0103. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
Do polymorphisms in MDR1 and CYP3A5 genes influence the risk of cytogenetic relapse in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib therapy?多药耐药基因1(MDR1)和细胞色素P450 3A5(CYP3A5)基因的多态性是否会影响接受伊马替尼治疗的慢性髓性白血病患者细胞遗传学复发的风险?
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Sep;58(9):1-9. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1287359. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of and Genetic Polymorphisms in Hydroxyurea Pharmacokinetics.[具体基因名称]和[具体基因名称]基因多态性在羟基脲药代动力学中的作用
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;15(8):1284. doi: 10.3390/life15081284.
2
Understanding and overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer.了解并克服癌症中的多药耐药性。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01059-1.
3
CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 SNPs significantly impact the response of Egyptian candidates to high-intensity statin therapy to atorvastatin.CYP3A4*1B 和 CYP3A5*3 单核苷酸多态性显著影响埃及患者对阿托伐他汀高强度他汀类药物治疗的反应。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Nov 10;29(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02109-7.
4
Impact of genetic variants in the solute carrier () genes encoding drug uptake transporters on the response to anticancer chemotherapy.编码药物摄取转运蛋白的溶质载体(SLC)基因中的遗传变异对抗癌化疗反应的影响。
Cancer Drug Resist. 2024 Jul 18;7:27. doi: 10.20517/cdr.2024.42. eCollection 2024.
5
Current Progress on the Influence Human Genetics Has on the Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Used to Treat Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.人类遗传学对用于治疗慢性髓性白血病的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂疗效影响的研究进展
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56545. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56545. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Molecular Mechanisms of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.慢性髓性白血病中酪氨酸激酶抑制剂耐药的分子机制。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2023;280:65-83. doi: 10.1007/164_2023_639.
7
Impact of and Polymorphisms on Imatinib Plasmatic Exposure: An Original Work and Meta-Analysis.和多态性对伊马替尼血药浓度的影响:一项原始研究和荟萃分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 7;24(4):3303. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043303.
8
Polymorphisms in drug metabolism genes predict the risk of refractory myasthenia gravis.药物代谢基因中的多态性可预测难治性重症肌无力的风险。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Nov;10(21):1155. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2543.
9
Association between Germline Single-Nucleotide Variants in ADME Genes and Major Molecular Response to Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.ADME基因种系单核苷酸变异与慢性髓性白血病患者对伊马替尼的主要分子反应之间的关联
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 21;11(20):6217. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206217.
10
Genetic Variants of ABC and SLC Transporter Genes and Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: Impact on Susceptibility and Prognosis.ABCA 和 SLC 转运蛋白基因的遗传变异与慢性髓性白血病:对易感性和预后的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 29;23(17):9815. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179815.