Suppr超能文献

在严重脑损伤后的强化康复治疗中,住院最初四周昏迷恢复量表修订版的改善可预测出院时的结局。

Improvement on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised During the First Four Weeks of Hospital Stay Predicts Outcome at Discharge in Intensive Rehabilitation After Severe Brain Injury.

机构信息

IRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation, Florence, Italy.

IRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;99(5):914-919. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic utility of serial assessment on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) during the first 4 weeks of intensive rehabilitation in patients surviving a severe brain injury.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

An intensive rehabilitation unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=110) consecutively admitted to the intensive rehabilitation unit. Inclusion criteria were (1) a diagnosis of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) caused by an acquired brain injury, and (2) aged >18 years.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent clinical evaluations using the Italian version of the CRS-R during the first month of hospital stay.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Behavioral classification on the CRS-R and the score on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at final discharge. Patients transitioning from UWS to MCS or emergence from MCS (E-MCS), and from MCS to E-MCS were classified as patients with improved responsiveness (IR).

RESULTS

After a mean ± SD hospital stay of 5.3±2.7 months, 59 of 110 patients (53.6%) achieved IR. In the multivariable analysis, a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (odds ratio =1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-2.66; P<.001) was the only significant predictor of IR at discharge. Fifty-three patients (48.2%) were classified as severely impaired at discharge (GOS=3). In the multivariable analysis, higher GOS scores were related to a higher CRS-R score at admission (B=.051; 95% CI, .027-.074; P<.001), a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (B=.087; 95% CI, .064-.110; P<.001), and an absence of severe infections (B=-.477; 95% CI, -.778 to -.176; P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement on the total CRS-R score and on different subscales across the first 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation discriminates patients who will have a better outcome at discharge, providing information for rehabilitation planning and for communication with patients and their caregivers.

摘要

目的

评估严重脑损伤患者在强化康复治疗的前 4 周内连续进行修订版昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)评估的预后价值。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

强化康复病房。

参与者

连续收治于强化康复病房的患者(N=110)。纳入标准为:(1)因获得性脑损伤而患有无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)或最小意识状态(MCS);(2)年龄>18 岁。

干预

所有患者在住院期间的第一个月内均接受意大利版 CRS-R 的临床评估。

主要观察指标

CRS-R 行为分类和最终出院时格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分。从 UWS 转为 MCS 或从 MCS 转为有睁眼运动(E-MCS)的患者,以及从 MCS 转为 E-MCS 的患者被归类为反应能力改善(IR)的患者。

结果

在平均(±SD)5.3±2.7 个月的住院治疗后,110 例患者中有 59 例(53.6%)实现了 IR。在多变量分析中,第 4 周时 CRS-R 评分变化更高(比值比=1.99;95%置信区间[CI],1.49-2.66;P<.001)是出院时 IR 的唯一显著预测因素。53 例患者(48.2%)出院时被归类为严重受损(GOS=3)。在多变量分析中,较高的 GOS 评分与入院时较高的 CRS-R 评分(B=.051;95%CI,.027-.074;P<.001)、第 4 周时 CRS-R 评分变化更大(B=.087;95%CI,.064-.110;P<.001)和无严重感染(B=-.477;95%CI,.778 至-.176;P=.002)有关。

结论

在住院康复治疗的前 4 周内,总 CRS-R 评分和不同亚量表的改善可以区分出院时预后较好的患者,为康复计划提供信息,并为与患者及其照顾者的沟通提供信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验