The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):687-693. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
Germline DNA damage repair gene mutation (gDDRm) is found in >10% of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Their prognostic and predictive impact relating to standard therapies is unclear.
To determine whether gDDRm status impacts benefit from established therapies in mPC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective, international, observational study. Medical records were reviewed for 390 mPC patients with known gDDRm status. All 372 patients from Royal Marsden (UK), Weill-Cornell (NY), and University of Washington (WA) were previously included in a prevalence study (Pritchard, NEJM 2016); the remaining 18 were gBRCA1/2m carriers, from the kConFab consortium, Australia.
Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data were collected. To account for potential differences between cohorts, a mixed-effect model (Weibull distribution) with random intercept per cohort was used.
The gDDRm status was known for all 390 patients (60 carriers of gDDRm [gDDRm+], including 37 gBRCA2m, and 330 cases not found to carry gDDRm [gDDRm-]); 74% and 69% were treated with docetaxel and abiraterone/enzalutamide, respectively, and 36% received PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum. Median OS from castration resistance was similar among groups (3.2 vs 3.0 yr, p=0.73). Median docetaxel PFS for gDDRm+ (6.8 mo) was not significantly different from that for gDDRm- (5.1 mo), and RRs were similar (gDDRm+=61%; gDDRm-=54%). There were no significant differences in median PFS and RR on first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide (gDDRm+=8.3 mo, gDDRm-=8.3 mo; gDDRm+=46%, gDDRm-=56%). Interaction test for PARPi/platinum and gDDRm+ resulted in an OS adjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.28-1.25; p=0.17). Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the analysis.
mPC patients with gDDRm appeared to benefit from standard therapies similarly to the overall population; prospective studies are ongoing to investigate the impact of PARPi/platinum.
Patients with inherited DNA repair mutations benefit from standard therapies similarly to other metastatic prostate cancer patients.
在转移性前列腺癌(mPC)中,超过 10%的患者存在种系 DNA 损伤修复基因突变(gDDRm)。目前尚不清楚其与标准治疗相关的预后和预测影响。
确定 gDDRm 状态是否会影响 mPC 患者对既定治疗的获益。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性、国际性、观察性研究。对 390 例已知 gDDRm 状态的 mPC 患者的病历进行了回顾。所有 372 例来自皇家马斯登(英国)、威尔康奈尔(美国纽约)和华盛顿大学(美国华盛顿州)的患者都曾参与过一项患病率研究(Pritchard,NEJM 2016);其余 18 例为 gBRCA1/2m 携带者,来自澳大利亚 kConFab 联盟。
收集了应答率(RR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)数据。为了考虑到队列之间的潜在差异,使用了具有随机截距的混合效应模型(Weibull 分布)。
390 例患者的 gDDRm 状态均已知(60 例携带 gDDRm [gDDRm+],包括 37 例 gBRCA2m 和 330 例未携带 gDDRm [gDDRm-]);74%和 69%分别接受了多西他赛和阿比特龙/恩杂鲁胺治疗,36%接受了 PARP 抑制剂(PARPi)和/或铂类药物治疗。从去势抵抗开始,各组的中位 OS 相似(3.2 年与 3.0 年,p=0.73)。gDDRm+(6.8 个月)的多西他赛 PFS 中位数与 gDDRm-(5.1 个月)无显著差异,RR 也相似(gDDRm+=61%;gDDRm-=54%)。在一线阿比特龙/恩杂鲁胺治疗中,gDDRm+的中位 PFS 和 RR 也无显著差异(gDDRm+=8.3 个月,gDDRm-=8.3 个月;gDDRm+=46%,gDDRm-=56%)。gDDRm+与 PARPi/铂类药物交互检验的 OS 调整后的危险比为 0.59(95%置信区间 0.28-1.25;p=0.17)。结果受到分析的回顾性性质的限制。
携带 gDDRm 的 mPC 患者似乎与总体人群一样,从标准治疗中获益;正在进行前瞻性研究以探讨 PARPi/铂类药物的影响。
携带遗传 DNA 修复突变的患者从标准治疗中获益与其他转移性前列腺癌患者相似。