Malik Dharmender, Sood Ashwani, Parmar Madan, Mittal Bhagwant Rai
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Nucl Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;33(1):14-19. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_119_17.
Phase analysis can be easily performed by different software to assess the left ventricular dyssynchrony from gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with high precision. However, the normal values of histogram bandwidth (HBW) and phase standard deviation (PSD) and their comparison using different programs have not been fully elucidated and actively being evaluated at present. The aim of this study was to determine the phase analysis parameters values and to compare the phase indices of two commonly used programs in a group of patients with normal gated SPECT-MPI.
Phase parameters were retrospectively evaluated in 138 consecutive nondiabetic patients having a normal gated SPECT-MPI using the quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) and Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb) software. HBW, PSD, and phase entropy were calculated separately using both programs.
The fair correlation between software programs was observed. HBW and PSD in QGS and ECTb were 26.20 ± 9.7 and 25.46 ± 8.0 (-value. 56, SEE 6.65) and 6.64 ± 2.5 and 7.65 ± 2.5 ( = 0.54, SEE 2.14), respectively. The value of phase entropy in QGS program was 45.08 ± 6.3. A fair correlation between phase entropy and PSD in QGS was observed ( = 0.44, 95% confidence interval-0.29-0.56).
Phase analysis parameters derived from gated SPECT-MPI in patients with normal myocardial perfusion are program dependent and may differ. The results cannot be interchangeably used in the same patients.
通过不同软件可轻松进行相位分析,以高精度评估门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)心肌灌注成像(MPI)中的左心室不同步性。然而,直方图带宽(HBW)和相位标准差(PSD)的正常值以及使用不同程序对它们进行的比较目前尚未完全阐明且正在积极评估中。本研究的目的是确定相位分析参数值,并比较一组门控SPECT-MPI正常的患者中两个常用程序的相位指标。
使用定量门控SPECT(QGS)和埃默里心脏工具箱(ECTb)软件,对138例连续的门控SPECT-MPI正常的非糖尿病患者的相位参数进行回顾性评估。分别使用这两个程序计算HBW、PSD和相位熵。
观察到软件程序之间存在中等程度的相关性。QGS和ECTb中的HBW分别为26.20±9.7和25.46±8.0(P值=0.56,标准误=6.65),PSD分别为6.64±2.5和7.65±2.5(P=0.54,标准误=2.14)。QGS程序中的相位熵值为45.08±6.3。观察到QGS中相位熵与PSD之间存在中等程度的相关性(P=0.44,95%置信区间为-0.29至0.56)。
心肌灌注正常的患者中,门控SPECT-MPI得出的相位分析参数依赖于程序,可能会有所不同。结果不能在同一患者中互换使用。