Suppr超能文献

严重主动脉瓣狭窄的无缝合主动脉瓣置换术的早期临床经验

Early Clinical Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Kim Do Jung, Kim Hyo-Hyun, Lee Shin-Young, Lee Sak, Chang Byung-Chul

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine.

出版信息

Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;51(1):1-7. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.1.1. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) has been developed as an alternative surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SU-AVR through an assessment of hemodynamic performance and safety.

METHODS

From December 2014 to June 2016, a total of 12 consecutive patients with severe AS underwent SU-AVR. The endpoints were overall survival and valve-related complications (paravalvular leakage, valve thrombosis, migration, endocarditis, and permanent pacemaker implantation). The mean follow-up duration was 18.1±8.6 months.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 77.1±5.8 years and their mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 9.2±17.7. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 94.5±37.3 minutes and 54.9±12.5 minutes, respectively. Follow-up echocardiography showed good prosthesis function with low transvalvular pressure gradients (mean, 13.9±8.6 mm Hg and peak, 27.2±15.0 mm Hg) at a mean of 9.9±4.2 months. No cases of primary paravalvular leakage, valve thrombosis, migration, or endocarditis were reported. A new permanent pacemaker was implanted in 1 patient (8.3%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 83.3%±10.8%.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience with SU-AVR demonstrated excellent early clinical outcomes with good hemodynamic results. However, there was a high incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to the rate for conventional AVR, which is a problem that should be solved.

摘要

背景

无缝合主动脉瓣置换术(SU-AVR)已被开发作为有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的一种替代手术治疗方法。本研究的目的是通过评估血流动力学性能和安全性来评价SU-AVR的临床结局。

方法

2014年12月至2016年6月,共有12例连续的严重AS患者接受了SU-AVR。终点指标为总生存率和瓣膜相关并发症(瓣周漏、瓣膜血栓形成、移位、心内膜炎和永久性起搏器植入)。平均随访时间为18.1±8.6个月。

结果

患者的平均年龄为77.1±5.8岁,平均胸外科医师协会评分9.2±17.7。平均体外循环时间和主动脉阻断时间分别为94.5±37.3分钟和54.9±12.5分钟。随访超声心动图显示,平均9.9±4.2个月时,人工瓣膜功能良好,跨瓣压差较低(平均13.9±8.6 mmHg,峰值27.2±15.0 mmHg)。未报告原发性瓣周漏、瓣膜血栓形成、移位或心内膜炎病例。1例患者(8.3%)植入了新的永久性起搏器。1年总生存率为83.3%±10.8%。

结论

我们在SU-AVR方面的初步经验显示出良好的早期临床结局和血流动力学结果。然而,与传统AVR相比,永久性起搏器植入的发生率较高,这是一个需要解决的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d739/5796611/d2a375591a26/kjtcv-51-001f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验