Matuseviciene Giedre, Johansson Jan, Möller Marika, Godbolt Alison K, Pansell Tony, Deboussard Catharina Nygren
Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Eye and Vision, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e018734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018734.
To assess (1) whether visual disturbances can be demonstrated with objective measures more often in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) than in orthopaedic controls and non-injured controls, (2) whether such objectively demonstrated disturbances change over time and (3) whether self-reported visual symptoms after mTBI correlate with objectively measurable changes in visuomotor performance.
A prospective, controlled, observational study, with assessments planned 7-10 and 75-100 days after injury.
Emergency department of a general hospital in Sweden.
15 patients with mTBI, 15 patients with minor orthopaedic injury, 15 non-injured controls, aged 18-40 years.
Visual examination, including assessment of visual acuity, accommodation, eye alignment, saccades and stereoacuity. Symptom assessment using Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms Survey (CISS) and Rivermead PostConcussion Symptoms Questionnaire.
Assessments were performed 4-13 and 81-322 days after injury (extended time frames for logistical reasons). No statistically significant difference was found between the mTBI and control groups regarding saccade performance and stereoacuity at any time point. The accommodative amplitude was significantly lower in the mTBI group compared with non-injured controls at baseline. 6 out of 13 patients with mTBI had accommodative insufficiency at follow-up. Near point of convergence in the mTBI group was receded at baseline and improved statistically significantly at follow-up. At baseline, patients with mTBI had significantly higher CISS score than orthopaedic and non-injured controls. For patients with mTBI, the CISS score correlated with fusional vergence.
There were some transient measurable visual changes regarding convergence in patients with mTBI during the subacute period after the injury. Our findings of persistence of accommodative insufficiency in a considerable proportion of patients with mTBI suggest that this visual function should not be overlooked in clinical assessment.
评估(1)与骨科对照组和未受伤对照组相比,轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者是否更常通过客观测量方法表现出视觉障碍;(2)这种客观显示的障碍是否随时间变化;(3)mTBI后自我报告的视觉症状是否与视觉运动表现的客观可测量变化相关。
一项前瞻性、对照、观察性研究,计划在受伤后7 - 10天和75 - 100天进行评估。
瑞典一家综合医院的急诊科。
15例mTBI患者、15例轻度骨科损伤患者、15例未受伤对照者,年龄在18 - 40岁之间。
视力检查,包括视力、调节、眼位、扫视和立体视锐度评估。使用集合不足症状调查(CISS)和Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷进行症状评估。
在受伤后4 - 13天和81 - 322天进行评估(由于后勤原因延长了时间范围)。在任何时间点,mTBI组和对照组在扫视表现和立体视锐度方面均未发现统计学上的显著差异。与未受伤对照组相比,mTBI组在基线时调节幅度显著降低。13例mTBI患者中有6例在随访时存在调节不足。mTBI组的集合近点在基线时后移,在随访时统计学上显著改善。在基线时,mTBI患者的CISS评分显著高于骨科和未受伤对照组。对于mTBI患者,CISS评分与融合性聚散相关。
mTBI患者在受伤后的亚急性期,在集合方面存在一些短暂的可测量视觉变化。我们发现相当一部分mTBI患者存在持续性调节不足,这表明在临床评估中不应忽视这种视觉功能。