Spanish Centre for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research (CEIFE), Madrid, Spain.
Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;118(3):461-470. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1627100. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
To investigate the population impact of previously reported interactions between warfarin and other drugs on international normalized ratio (INR) levels.
Using The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a United Kingdom primary care database, a cohort of warfarin users between 2005 and 2013 ( = 121,962) was followed until the first qualifying prescription for the potential interacting drugs was evaluated. Sixteen sub-cohorts, one for each study drug, and a control sub-cohort of warfarin were ascertained. Short-term changes in INR levels were assessed by comparing INR values measured before and after initiation of the interacting drug with paired Student's -test. We also evaluated the proportion of patients with INR values outside the therapeutic range (INR: 2-3).
Miconazole use was associated with the highest mean increase in INR (+3.35), followed by amiodarone (+1.28), fluconazole (+0.79), metronidazole (+0.75) and nystatin (+0.65). After subtracting the natural INR variation observed in the control sub-cohort, supra-therapeutic levels (INR > 3) were found in 53.2% (miconazole), 45.5% (amiodarone), 23.3% (metronidazole), 23.2% (fluconazole) and 17.6% (nystatin) of patients initiating treatment with these drugs. Carbamazepine use was associated with a mean INR decrease of -0.63 and infra-therapeutic levels (INR < 2) were observed in 46.2% of patients initiating carbamazepine. For all other drugs, the change was small to moderate, in absolute INR units (+0.23 to +0.55) and in the proportion of patients with INR levels out of therapeutic range (<16%).
Clinically potentially important interactions were observed in several study drugs. The majority of them, although confirmed, had little impact after adjusting for standard INR variability in the general population of warfarin users.
研究先前报道的华法林与其他药物相互作用对国际标准化比值(INR)水平的人群影响。
利用英国初级保健数据库 The Health Improvement Network(THIN),对 2005 年至 2013 年间的华法林使用者进行随访,直到评估潜在相互作用药物的首次合格处方。确定了 16 个子队列,每个子队列对应一种研究药物,以及一个华法林对照子队列。通过比较起始相互作用药物前后测量的 INR 值,使用配对学生 t 检验评估 INR 水平的短期变化。我们还评估了 INR 值不在治疗范围内(INR:2-3)的患者比例。
咪康唑的使用与 INR 最高平均升高(+3.35)相关,其次是胺碘酮(+1.28)、氟康唑(+0.79)、甲硝唑(+0.75)和制霉菌素(+0.65)。扣除对照子队列中观察到的自然 INR 变化后,在开始使用这些药物的患者中,53.2%(咪康唑)、45.5%(胺碘酮)、23.3%(甲硝唑)、23.2%(氟康唑)和 17.6%(制霉菌素)的患者出现了超治疗水平(INR>3)。卡马西平的使用与 INR 平均降低-0.63 相关,在开始使用卡马西平的患者中,46.2%的患者出现了低于治疗水平(INR<2)。对于所有其他药物,变化幅度较小到中等,绝对 INR 单位变化(+0.23 至+0.55)和治疗范围外的 INR 水平患者比例变化(<16%)。
在几种研究药物中观察到了具有临床潜在重要性的相互作用。其中大多数药物虽然得到了证实,但在调整了华法林使用者普通人群中 INR 变异性的标准后,影响很小。