Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Mar;27(3):444-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.009.
The purpose of this study was to examine 5-year outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients previously enrolled in a nonoperative rotator cuff tear treatment program.
Patients with chronic (>3 months), full-thickness rotator cuff tears (demonstrated on imaging) who were referred to 1 of 2 senior shoulder surgeons were enrolled in the study between October 2008 and September 2010. They participated in a comprehensive, nonoperative, home-based treatment program. After 3 months, the outcome in these patients was defined as "successful" or "failed." Patients in the successful group were essentially asymptomatic and did not require surgery. Patients in the failed group were symptomatic and consented to undergo surgical repair. All patients were followed up at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 or more years.
At 5 or more years, all patients were contacted for follow-up; the response rate was 84%. Approximately 75% of patients remained successfully treated with nonoperative treatment at 5 years and reported a mean rotator cuff quality-of-life index score of 83 of 100 (SD, 16). Furthermore, between 2 and 5 years, only 3 patients who had previously been defined as having a successful outcome became more symptomatic and underwent surgical rotator cuff repair. Those in whom nonoperative treatment had failed and who underwent surgical repair had a mean rotator cuff quality-of-life index score of 89 (SD, 11) at 5-year follow-up. The operative and nonoperative groups at 5-year follow-up were not significantly different (P = .11).
Nonoperative treatment is an effective and lasting option for many patients with a chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tear. While some clinicians may argue that nonoperative treatment delays inevitable surgical repair, our study shows that patients can do very well over time.
本研究旨在观察先前参加非手术肩袖撕裂治疗计划的前瞻性队列患者的 5 年结果。
2008 年 10 月至 2010 年 9 月,将影像学检查证实患有慢性(>3 个月)、全层肩袖撕裂的患者转诊至 2 位资深肩部外科医生之一,将这些患者纳入研究。他们参加了一个全面的、非手术的、家庭为基础的治疗计划。3 个月后,这些患者的结果被定义为“成功”或“失败”。成功组的患者基本无症状,无需手术。失败组的患者有症状,并同意接受手术修复。所有患者在 1 年、2 年和 5 年或更长时间进行随访。
5 年或更长时间时,所有患者均联系进行随访,应答率为 84%。大约 75%的患者在 5 年时仍接受非手术治疗,治疗效果成功,报告的平均肩袖生活质量指数评分为 83 分(标准差,16 分)。此外,在 2 年至 5 年期间,先前被定义为治疗成功的 3 例患者出现了更多的症状,并接受了肩袖修复手术。那些非手术治疗失败并接受手术修复的患者,在 5 年随访时的平均肩袖生活质量指数评分为 89 分(标准差,11 分)。5 年随访时,手术组和非手术组无显著差异(P = .11)。
非手术治疗是许多慢性、全层肩袖撕裂患者的有效且持久的选择。虽然一些临床医生可能认为非手术治疗会延迟不可避免的手术修复,但我们的研究表明,患者随着时间的推移可以恢复得很好。