De Meurechy N, Mommaerts M Y
European Face Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
European Face Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;47(6):743-754. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
This systematic review provides an overview of the historical evolution of the prosthetic temporomandibular joint and addresses the challenges and complications faced by engineers and surgeons, in an effort to shed light on why only a few systems remain available. A better understanding of the history of temporomandibular joint prostheses might also provide insights into the origin of the negative public opinion of the prosthesis, which is based on outdated information. A computerized search using the PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online, Ovid, and Cochrane Library databases was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Out of 7122 articles identified, 41 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Although several historical reviews have been published previously, none has covered such an extensive time period or has described all designs. Furthermore, besides providing a historical overview, this review discusses the rationale behind the evolution in design and biomaterials, which have largely contributed to the outcomes of the prosthetic systems.
本系统评价概述了人工颞下颌关节的历史演变，并探讨了工程师和外科医生所面临的挑战和并发症，以阐明为何只有少数系统仍在使用。更好地了解颞下颌关节假体的历史，也可能有助于深入了解基于过时信息的公众对假体的负面看法的根源。按照PRISMA指南，使用PubMed Central、ScienceDirect、Wiley Online、Ovid和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了计算机检索。在识别出的7122篇文章中，有41篇符合本系统评价的纳入标准。尽管之前已经发表了几篇历史综述，但没有一篇涵盖如此广泛的时间段，也没有描述所有的设计。此外，除了提供历史概述外，本综述还讨论了设计和生物材料演变背后的原理，这些在很大程度上促成了假体系统的结果。
