The effect of resident involvement on bariatric surgical outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND

Surgical residency training programs in the United States are modeled on the principle of graduated responsibility. Residents are given greater responsibility and autonomy in the operating room and during perioperative care as they gain surgical skills and progress through their training. The impact of this method of surgical training on patient outcomes remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare early patient morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery in cases with and without resident participation using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

METHODS

All patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2006 through 2010 were identified within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. These patients were divided into three groups based on resident involvement in their surgery (no resident, senior-level resident, and junior-level resident). The effect of resident involvement and postgraduate year level on 30-d morbidity and mortality was investigated using composite outcomes, including cardiac events (acute myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation), pulmonary events (pneumonia, prolonged intubation, or unplanned reintubation), wound (superficial surgical site infection, deep surgical site infection, organ-space infection, or dehiscence), septic events (sepsis and septic shock), clotting events (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis), and renal events (urinary tract infection and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis). Length of hospital stay, unplanned return to the operating room, and 30-d mortality were also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 19,616 patients underwent bariatric surgery from the year 2006 through 2010; 8960 (45.7%) procedures were performed with resident involvement, with 5406 (36.7%) of these cases involving a senior-level resident. Operations involving a senior-level resident were more likely to experience postoperative cardiac events (P < 0.006), pulmonary events (P = 0.03), wound events (P = 0.01), septic events (P < 0.002), renal events (P ≤ 0.01), prolonged operative time (P < 0.0001), and a prolonged length of hospital stay (P < 0.0001) than those that involved either no resident or a junior-level resident.

CONCLUSIONS

Although bariatric operations involving senior-level residents have more statistically significant morbidity outcomes, these morbidity outcomes are related more to perioperative care rather than intraoperative resident involvement. This suggests that more emphasis on perioperative progressive responsibility may be needed to match operative oversight.