• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与减重外科医生相比,由高级外科住院医师实施的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的结果。

Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed by senior surgical residents as compared to bariatric surgeons.

作者信息

Mostafa Mohammad, Bader Raneem, Asfour George, Imam Ashraf, Miller Rafael, Sapojnikov Shimon, Zakai Barak-Bar, Khalayleh Harbi

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot and the Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

The Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11698-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11698-1
PMID:40268784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the safety and outcomes of LSG performed by senior surgical residents (SSR). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) performed by SSR under the supervision of a senior bariatric surgeon (SBS) with those performed solely by SBS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent LSG. Patients were divided into two groups: Consultant group surgery performed using SBS. Supervised resident group comprised surgeries performed by SSR under the supervision of SBS. Data collected included demographics, body mass index (BMI), excessive body weight loss (EBWL), complications, and follow-up results.

RESULTS

Of the 480 patients, 350 (72.9%) underwent surgery by SBS (Consultant Group), and 130 (27.1%) by SSR with supervision (Supervised resident Group). Operative times were longer in supervised resident group (104.13 min) than in consultant group (82.63 min, P < 0.001). Early complications occurred in 3.1% of the cases, with no significant difference between the groups. Postoperative BMI and EBWL showed slightly better short-term results in supervised resident group, although differences diminished in the long term.

DISCUSSION

LSG performed using SSR under the supervision of SBS is safe and effective. While operative times were longer for residents, short-term outcomes were comparable and there were no adverse effects on long-term results. These findings support the integration of LSG training into surgical residency programs.

CONCLUSION

LSG can be safely performed using SSR with appropriate supervision, with no detrimental impact on the outcomes. This highlights the feasibility of involving residents in LSG while maintaining a high standard of care.

摘要

背景

关于高级外科住院医师(SSR)实施腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的安全性和结果的数据有限。本研究旨在比较在高级减重外科医生(SBS)监督下由SSR实施的LSG与仅由SBS实施的LSG的结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了接受LSG的患者。患者分为两组:顾问组手术由SBS实施。监督住院医师组包括在SBS监督下由SSR实施的手术。收集的数据包括人口统计学、体重指数(BMI)、过多体重减轻(EBWL)、并发症和随访结果。

结果

480例患者中,350例(72.9%)由SBS实施手术(顾问组),130例(27.1%)由SSR在监督下实施手术(监督住院医师组)。监督住院医师组的手术时间(104.13分钟)比顾问组长(82.63分钟,P<0.001)。3.1%的病例发生早期并发症,两组之间无显著差异。术后BMI和EBWL在监督住院医师组的短期结果略好,尽管长期差异减小。

讨论

在SBS监督下由SSR实施的LSG是安全有效的。虽然住院医师的手术时间较长,但短期结果相当,对长期结果没有不利影响。这些发现支持将LSG培训纳入外科住院医师培训项目。

结论

在适当监督下,SSR可以安全地实施LSG,对结果没有不利影响。这突出了让住院医师参与LSG同时保持高标准护理的可行性。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed by senior surgical residents as compared to bariatric surgeons.与减重外科医生相比,由高级外科住院医师实施的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11698-1.
2
Safety and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a General Surgery Residency Program.普通外科住院医师培训项目中腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的安全性与治疗效果
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00063.
3
Are bariatric operations performed by residents safe and efficient?住院医师实施的减肥手术安全且高效吗?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr;13(4):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in obese Korean patients.肥胖韩国患者的腹腔镜胃旁路手术与袖状胃切除术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 28;21(44):12612-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12612.
5
Weight-loss outcomes of SPIDER(®) sleeve gastrectomy at 6 months compared to traditional laparoscopic technique.与传统腹腔镜技术相比,SPIDER(®)袖状胃切除术6个月时的减重效果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2043-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4451-z. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
6
Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: early outcome in 140 patients.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:140例患者的早期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为主要减肥手术的长期疗效。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
8
Medium-Term Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Matched Comparison with Gastric Bypass.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的中期结果:与胃旁路术的匹配对照比较
Obes Surg. 2015 Aug;25(8):1431-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1582-1.
9
Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization.减重手术中腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的学习曲线:系统评价及标准化介绍。
Obes Surg. 2020 Feb;30(2):640-656. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04230-7.
10
The safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy among diabetic patients.糖尿病患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):907-911. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5053-0. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the safety and efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly (>60 years) with severe obesity: an umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis.比较袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗老年(>60 岁)肥胖症患者的安全性和疗效:伞式系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3541-3554. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000629.
2
Comparative Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass Up to 5 Years After Surgery in Patients With Severe Obesity.肥胖症患者行袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术 5 年后的安全性比较。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1160-1169. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4981.
3
Safety and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a General Surgery Residency Program.
普通外科住院医师培训项目中腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的安全性与治疗效果
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00063.
4
Surgical resident training program to perform laparoscopic bariatric procedures: Are safety and postoperative outcomes compromised?外科住院医师培训计划实施腹腔镜减重手术:安全性和术后结果是否受到影响?
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar;99(3):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
5
Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety.外科受训者对减重手术安全性的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):3014-3025. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6587-0. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
The effect of resident involvement on bariatric surgical outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.住院医师参与对减重手术结果的影响:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)分析
J Surg Res. 2018 Mar;223:224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.038. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
7
Resident and fellow participation in Thyroid and Parathyroid surgery: an ACS-NSQIP clinical outcomes analysis.住院医师和研究员参与甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划临床结果分析。
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:346-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy.第五届国际共识会议:袖状胃切除术的现状
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 May;12(4):750-756. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
9
A Challenge between Trainee Education and Patient Safety: Does Fellow Participation Impact Postoperative Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery?住院医师培训与患者安全之间的挑战:肥胖症手术后住院医师的参与是否会影响术后结果?
Obes Surg. 2016 Sep;26(9):1999-2005. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2073-8.
10
Update on Sleeve Gastrectomy Leak Rate with the Use of Reinforcement.使用加固材料后袖状胃切除术漏率的最新情况
Obes Surg. 2016 Jan;26(1):146-50. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1899-9.