El-Kotob Rasha, Craven B Catharine, Mathur Sunita, Ditor David S, Oh Paul, Miyatani Masae, Verrier Mary C
University Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Lyndhurst Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Winter;24(1):28-36. doi: 10.1310/sci17-00002. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
Although cardiac autonomic dysfunction is a contributing factor for cardiovascular disease development in individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI), it remains poorly understood. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has the potential to non-invasively assess the cardiac autonomic nervous system. The study objectives are (a) to determine if there are differences in HRV measures across neurological level of impairment (NLI) and American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) subgroups, and (b) to determine if there is a relationship between HRV frequency measures (low frequency [LF] and high frequency [HF]) at rest. We conducted a secondary data analysis of a primary data set from a published cross-sectional study of electrocardiogram recordings of 56 subjects (44 men and 12 women, mean age ± = 46.75 ± 12.44 years) with a chronic traumatic SCI (C1-T12, AIS A-D, ≥2 years post injury). HRV was analyzed using time and frequency domain measures. There were no significant HRV differences across NLI and AIS subgroups. The LF and HF indices were positively correlated in the entire sample ( = 0.708, < .0001) and among impairment subgroups. No differences were observed in the HRV time and frequency measures when compared across NLI and AIS subgroups. The results were considered inconclusive, since possible explanations include inadequate sample size as well as other physiological considerations. A positive correlation was found between LF and HF when assessed at rest. The relationship between LF and HF may not necessarily represent a rebalanced autonomic nervous system, but it does question the utility of solely measuring LF:HF at rest in persons with chronic SCI.
尽管心脏自主神经功能障碍是脊髓损伤(SCI)患者心血管疾病发展的一个促成因素,但其仍未得到充分了解。心率变异性(HRV)分析有潜力对心脏自主神经系统进行无创评估。本研究的目的是:(a)确定不同神经损伤水平(NLI)和美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级(AIS)亚组之间的HRV测量值是否存在差异;(b)确定静息时HRV频率测量值(低频[LF]和高频[HF])之间是否存在关系。我们对一个已发表的横断面研究的原始数据集进行了二次数据分析,该研究记录了56名慢性创伤性SCI患者(44名男性和12名女性,平均年龄± = 46.75 ± 12.44岁,损伤节段为C1 - T12,AIS分级为A - D,受伤时间≥2年)的心电图。使用时域和频域测量方法对HRV进行分析。在NLI和AIS亚组之间,HRV没有显著差异。LF和HF指数在整个样本中呈正相关( = 0.708, < .0001),在各损伤亚组中也是如此。在比较NLI和AIS亚组时,HRV的时域和频域测量值没有观察到差异。由于可能的解释包括样本量不足以及其他生理因素,结果被认为无定论。静息时评估发现LF和HF之间呈正相关。LF和HF之间的关系不一定代表自主神经系统重新平衡,但这确实质疑了仅在慢性SCI患者静息时测量LF:HF的实用性。