Vladisavljević Marko, Mentus Vladimir
Institute of Economic Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia.
Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia.
Psychol Rep. 2019 Feb;122(1):36-60. doi: 10.1177/0033294118756335. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
In this article, we examine the structure of the subjective well-being and its relation to objective well-being indicators using the data from the European Union's Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) from Serbia. This is one of the first papers to analyze a new module on subjective well-being from EU-SILC micro-dataset (with over 20,000 respondents). We investigate the factor structure of the items and the differences in the association of subjective well-being dimensions with objective indicators of well-being within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Better Life Initiative framework. Three factors emerge from the principal components analysis: general life satisfaction, affective well-being, and satisfaction with the local environment. The analysis further reveals that life satisfaction is more related to the material living conditions, such as income, unemployment, and housing conditions, while affective well-being is more related to non-material indicators of well-being such as perceived health, personal security, and social connections. On the other hand, positive and negative affect within the affective well-being are not clearly separable, nor is the eudaimonic indicator from either life satisfaction or affective well-being.
在本文中，我们利用塞尔维亚的欧盟收入和生活条件调查（EU - SILC）数据，研究主观幸福感的结构及其与客观幸福感指标的关系。这是首批分析来自EU - SILC微观数据集（超过20,000名受访者）中关于主观幸福感新模块的论文之一。我们在经济合作与发展组织“美好生活倡议”框架内，研究这些项目的因子结构以及主观幸福感维度与幸福感客观指标之间关联的差异。主成分分析得出三个因子：总体生活满意度、情感幸福感和对当地环境的满意度。分析进一步表明，生活满意度与物质生活条件，如收入、失业和住房条件，更为相关，而情感幸福感与幸福感的非物质指标，如感知健康、人身安全和社会关系，更为相关。另一方面，情感幸福感中的积极和消极情绪并没有明显区分，幸福主义指标与生活满意度或情感幸福感也没有明显区分。
